Working Group Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité Medical Faculty, Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Kardiologie - ECRC, Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Aug;38(8):1837-1850. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02571-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
The goal of this study was to evaluate a three-dimensional compressed sensing (3D-CS) LGE prototype sequence for the detection and quantification of myocardial fibrosis in patients with chronic myocardial infarction (CMI) and myocarditis (MYC) compared with a 2D-LGE standard. Patients with left-ventricular LGE due to CMI (n = 33) or MYC (n = 20) were prospectively recruited. 2D-LGE and 3D-CS images were acquired in random order at 1.5 Tesla. 3D-CS short axis (SAX) images were reconstructed corresponding to 2D SAX images. LGE was quantitatively assessed on patient and segment level using semi-automated threshold methods. Image quality (4-point scoring system), Contrast-ratio (CR) and acquisition times were compared. There was no significant difference between 2D and 3D sequences regarding global LGE (%) (CMI [2D-LGE: 11.4 ± 7.5; 3D-LGE: 11.5 ± 8.5; p = 0.99]; MYC [2D-LGE: 27.0 ± 15.7; 3D-LGE: 26.2 ± 13.1; p = 0.70]) and segmental LGE-extent (p = 0.63). 3D-CS identified papillary infarction in 5 cases which was not present in 2D images. 2D-LGE acquisition time was shorter (2D: median: 06:59 min [IQR: 05:51-08:18]; 3D: 14:48 min [12:45-16:57]). 3D-CS obtained better quality scores (2D: 2.06 ± 0.56 vs. 3D: 2.29 ± 0.61). CR did not differ (p = 0.63) between basal and apical regions in 3D-CS images but decreased significantly in 2D apical images (CR basal: 2D: 0.77 ± 0.11, 3D: 0.59 ± 0.10; CR apical: 2D: 0.64 ± 0.17, 3D: 0.53 ± 0.11). 3D-LGE shows high congruency with standard LGE and allows better identification of small lesions. However, the current 3D-CS LGE sequence did not provide PSIR reconstruction and acquisition time was longer.
这项研究的目的是评估一种用于检测和量化慢性心肌梗死(CMI)和心肌炎(MYC)患者心肌纤维化的三维压缩感知(3D-CS)LGE 原型序列,与二维 LGE 标准相比。前瞻性招募了 33 例因 CMI 导致左心室 LGE 的患者和 20 例因 MYC 导致左心室 LGE 的患者。在 1.5T 上以随机顺序采集 2D-LGE 和 3D-CS 图像。根据二维 SAX 图像重建 3D-CS 短轴(SAX)图像。使用半自动阈值方法在患者和节段水平上对 LGE 进行定量评估。比较图像质量(4 分评分系统)、对比比(CR)和采集时间。在全局 LGE(CMI[2D-LGE:11.4±7.5;3D-LGE:11.5±8.5;p=0.99];MYC[2D-LGE:27.0±15.7;3D-LGE:26.2±13.1;p=0.70])和节段性 LGE 程度(p=0.63)方面,2D 和 3D 序列之间没有显著差异。3D-CS 在 5 例中发现了 2D 图像中不存在的乳头肌梗死。2D-LGE 采集时间更短(2D:中位数:06:59 分钟[IQR:05:51-08:18];3D:14:48 分钟[12:45-16:57])。3D-CS 获得了更好的质量评分(2D:2.06±0.56 vs. 3D:2.29±0.61)。CR 在 3D-CS 图像的基底和顶端区域之间没有差异(p=0.63),但在 2D 顶端图像中显著降低(CR 基底:2D:0.77±0.11,3D:0.59±0.10;CR 顶端:2D:0.64±0.17,3D:0.53±0.11)。3D-LGE 与标准 LGE 具有高度一致性,允许更好地识别小病变。然而,当前的 3D-CS LGE 序列未提供 PSIR 重建,采集时间更长。