Suppr超能文献

亚叶酸、氟尿嘧啶和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)联合贝伐珠单抗与 FOLFIRI 联合阿柏西普作为转移性结直肠癌二线治疗的比较。

A Comparison of Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus Aflibercept as Second-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Aug;34(8):e323-e328. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab or aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients pretreated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed the treatment outcomes of patients receiving FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab or aflibercept as second-line treatment for mCRC between October 2017 and March 2020. This analysis included 67 patients receiving FOLFIRI plus aflibercept and 83 receiving FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.6% (95% confidence interval 4.85-22.34) in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group and 14.7% (95% confidence interval 6.68-22.71) in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group. This difference in ORR was not statistically significant. The median progression-free survival was 8.6 months in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group and 8.5 months in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group (P = 0.752). Patients in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group showed a median overall survival of 12.4 months, whereas patients in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group had a median overall survival of 13.7 months (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in survival between the two treatment groups. The adverse events were also largely similar between the two groups. However, hypertension of grade 3 or more was more frequent in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group.

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus aflibercept had similar anti-tumour activities and toxicity profiles when used as second-line therapy in mCRC patients. Based on these data, both aflibercept and bevacizumab are suitable anti-angiogenic agents when used in combination with FOLFIRI for mCRC.

摘要

目的

比较在奥沙利铂为基础的化疗预处理的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中,使用亚叶酸、氟尿嘧啶和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)联合贝伐珠单抗或阿柏西普的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

我们分析了 2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗或阿柏西普作为二线治疗 mCRC 的患者的治疗结果。该分析包括 67 例接受 FOLFIRI 联合阿柏西普和 83 例接受 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗的患者。

结果

FOLFIRI-阿柏西普组的总体缓解率(ORR)为 13.6%(95%置信区间 4.85-22.34),FOLFIRI-贝伐珠单抗组为 14.7%(95%置信区间 6.68-22.71)。ORR 差异无统计学意义。FOLFIRI-贝伐珠单抗组的中位无进展生存期为 8.6 个月,FOLFIRI-阿柏西普组为 8.5 个月(P=0.752)。FOLFIRI-贝伐珠单抗组患者的中位总生存期为 12.4 个月,而 FOLFIRI-阿柏西普组患者的中位总生存期为 13.7 个月(P=0.276)。两组患者的生存无显著差异。两组的不良反应也基本相似。然而,FOLFIRI-阿柏西普组 3 级或以上高血压更为常见。

结论

在 mCRC 患者中,FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗和 FOLFIRI 联合阿柏西普作为二线治疗的抗肿瘤活性和毒性谱相似。基于这些数据,阿柏西普和贝伐珠单抗在与 FOLFIRI 联合用于 mCRC 时都是合适的抗血管生成药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验