From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2022;46(3):487-491. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001292. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
To gain better insight into the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of morphological intervertebral disc (IVD) details, such as annular and nucleus pulposus dimensions, by comparing contemporaneously obtained MRI and postdiscogram computed tomography (CT) scans of nondegenerated IVDs.
Axial T2-weighted images and same-day postdiscography CTs, acquired after the MRI, of 26 normal-appearing lumbar IVDs (control IVDs at discography) were compared. The location and extent of central hyperintense zone on MRI and the extent of contrast distribution on CT relative to the IVD width (in anteroposterior [AP] and lateral planes) were assessed, with difference in measures between the modalities used to provide apparent inner annulus thickness and to estimate dimensions of also the outer annulus and location of nucleus pulposus.
The mean (SD) extent of contrast distribution on CT discograms (53.1% [6.6%] and 58.1% [8.7%] of AP and lateral IVD width) was smaller than (P < 0.001 for both), and correlated weakly (r = 0.31 and 0.32 for AP and lateral planes) with corresponding measurements (58.4% [5.3%] and 65.7% [5.9%], respectively) for central hyperintense zone at MRI. The center of contrast opacification on CT discograms was located posterior to that of central T2 hyperintense zone on MRI in AP (P < 0.01), without any difference in lateral direction (P = 0.60).
Normal-appearing lumbar IVDs are supported by outer annulus of larger relative thickness anteriorly, seen on both modalities. The shown discrepancy between the central T2 hyperintense zone and contrast distribution on CT discogram might reflect the inner annulus or structural changes within the borderzone nucleus and annulus. The exact nucleus size and inner annulus thickness could not be established due to a variable permeation of contrast across the central hyperintense zone on T2-weighted images.
通过比较同期获得的无退变椎间盘中形态椎间盘(IVD)细节(如环形和髓核)的磁共振成像(MRI)和椎间盘造影后计算机断层扫描(CT),更好地了解 MRI 中 IVD 形态的表现。
比较 26 个正常腰椎 IVD(椎间盘造影时的对照 IVD)的轴向 T2 加权图像和同天进行的椎间盘造影后 CT。评估 MRI 上中央高信号区的位置和范围以及 CT 上相对于 IVD 宽度(在前后[AP]和侧位)的对比分布程度,两种方式之间的差异用于提供明显的内环厚度并估计外环和髓核位置的大小。
CT 椎间盘造影上的对比分布范围的平均值(SD)(AP 和侧位 IVD 宽度的 53.1%[6.6%]和 58.1%[8.7%])较小(均 P <0.001),与 MRI 上中央高信号区的相应测量值(分别为 58.4%[5.3%]和 65.7%[5.9%])呈弱相关(AP 和侧位平面 r =0.31 和 0.32)。CT 椎间盘造影上的对比混浊中心位于 MRI 上中央 T2 高信号区的后部(AP,P <0.01),而在侧位方向上没有差异(P =0.60)。
在前部,两种方式均显示出正常的腰椎 IVD 由较大相对厚度的外环支撑。MRI 上的中央 T2 高信号区与 CT 椎间盘造影上的对比分布之间的差异可能反映了内环或交界区核和环内的结构变化。由于 T2 加权图像上的中央高信号区对比度的渗透程度不同,因此无法确定确切的核大小和内环厚度。