Suppr超能文献

右侧腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与左侧腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Right laparoscopic adrenalectomy vs. left laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yaxuan, Yang Zhan, Chang Xueliang, Li Jingdong, Zhang Yanping, Teng Zhihai, Han Zhenwei

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):9-19. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.108212. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Due to more complex anatomical features, right laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA) could be more challenging than left laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LLA). However, this opinion remains elusive.

AIM

To evaluate the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of RLA versus LLA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature research of the PubMed, Ovid, Scopus databases (up to March 2021) and citation lists were performed to identify eligible studies. All studies comparing RLA versus LLA were included. Data were analysed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 studies including 780 patients (RLA 361; LLA 419) were included. The operative time was similar in both groups (WMD -9.38 min, 95% CI: -21.04 to 2.28; p = 0.11). Compared with LLA, RLA showed greater volume of estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 13.82 ml, 95% CI: 3.77, 23.88; p = 0.007) and higher conversion rate (OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.12 to 10.57; p = 0.03). RLA had comparable complications (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.76; p = 0.71), Clavien Dindo score ≥ 3 complications (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.09 to 1.65; p = 0.20), and length of hospital stay (WMD -0.07 days, 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.21; p = 0.61). The transperitoneal approach analysis showed consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

RLA is associated with a higher risk of bleeding and higher conversion rate.

摘要

引言

由于解剖结构更为复杂,右侧腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(RLA)可能比左侧腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LLA)更具挑战性。然而,这一观点仍不明确。

目的

评估RLA与LLA的围手术期和术后结果。

材料与方法

对PubMed、Ovid、Scopus数据库(截至2021年3月)进行系统的文献检索,并查阅参考文献列表以确定符合条件的研究。纳入所有比较RLA与LLA的研究。使用RevMan 5.4软件进行数据分析。

结果

总体而言,纳入了5项研究,共780例患者(RLA组361例;LLA组419例)。两组的手术时间相似(加权均数差为-9.38分钟,95%置信区间:-21.04至2.28;p = 0.11)。与LLA相比,RLA的估计失血量(EBL)更多(加权均数差为13.82毫升,95%置信区间:3.77至23.88;p = 0.007),且中转率更高(比值比=3.45,95%置信区间:1.12至10.57;p = 0.03)。RLA的并发症发生率(比值比=0.88,95%置信区间:0.44至1.76;p = 0.71)、Clavien-Dindo评分≥3级的并发症发生率(比值比=0.38,95%置信区间:0.09至1.65;p = 0.20)以及住院时间(加权均数差为-0.07天,95%置信区间:-0.35至0.21;p = 0.61)相当。经腹途径分析显示结果一致。

结论

RLA与更高的出血风险和中转率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a63/8886482/902802d63f35/WIITM-17-44873-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验