Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Thromb Haemost. 2022 Sep;122(9):1443-1453. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743469. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
The use of the antiplatelet agent aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) was previously routinely recommended for the primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with diabetes, but recent large-scale randomized trials have failed to demonstrate a sizeable net clinical benefit with a once-daily, low-dose (81-100 mg) regimen in this population. Previous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have suggested that the aspirin formulation (enteric-coated) and dosing schedule (once daily) studied in randomized trials for primary prevention of CV events defining contemporary clinical practice may not leverage the full potential of the drug, particularly in patients with diabetes. Indeed, the diabetic platelets bear characteristics that increase their thrombotic potential and alter their pharmacologic response to the drug. Consequently, the appropriateness of studying a uniform aspirin regimen in landmark primary prevention trials needs to be revisited. In this review, we present the evidence showing that diabetes not only increases baseline platelet reactivity, but also alters platelet response to aspirin through different mechanisms including a faster platelet turnover rate. Obesity, which is frequently associated with diabetes, also impacts its pharmacokinetics via an increase in distribution volume. Small-scale pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have suggested that the relative aspirin resistance phenotype observed in patients with diabetes may be reversed with a twice-daily dosing schedule, and with nonenteric-coated aspirin formulations. Properly powered randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of aspirin dosing schedules and formulations tailored to the population of patients with diabetes are urgently required to optimize patient care.
抗血小板药物阿司匹林(乙酰水杨酸)曾被常规推荐用于糖尿病患者的心血管(CV)事件一级预防,但最近的大规模随机试验未能证明在该人群中,每日一次、低剂量(81-100mg)方案能带来显著的净临床获益。先前的药代动力学和药效学研究表明,在随机试验中用于 CV 事件一级预防的阿司匹林制剂(肠溶)和给药方案(每日一次)可能无法充分发挥药物的潜力,特别是在糖尿病患者中。事实上,糖尿病患者的血小板具有增加其血栓形成倾向并改变其对药物的药理反应的特征。因此,需要重新审视在具有里程碑意义的一级预防试验中研究统一的阿司匹林方案的适当性。在这篇综述中,我们提出了证据表明,糖尿病不仅增加了基础血小板反应性,而且还通过不同的机制改变了对阿司匹林的反应,包括更快的血小板更新率。肥胖症常与糖尿病相关,也通过增加分布容积来影响其药代动力学。小规模的药代动力学和药效学研究表明,糖尿病患者中观察到的相对阿司匹林抵抗表型可能通过每日两次的给药方案和非肠溶阿司匹林制剂得到逆转。迫切需要进行适当设计的随机对照试验,以评估针对糖尿病患者人群的阿司匹林给药方案和制剂的疗效和安全性,从而优化患者的治疗效果。