Miriyala Raviteja, Mahantshetty Umesh, Maheshwari Amita, Gupta Sudeep
Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Mar;32(3):260-265. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002531.
Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. In view of the difficulties associated with implementation of standard radiation protocols in low- and middle-income countries and the associated toxicities of chemoradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery has been tried as an alternative treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.
A comprehensive review was undertaken of the existing literature, caveats and potential avenues of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Randomized studies conducted in the pre-chemoradiation era comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with definitive radiotherapy alone showed favorable outcomes with the chemo-surgical approach. However, contemporary studies evaluating the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery have failed to establish this approach as the standard. About 25-30% of patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain inoperable and require definitive chemoradiation. A similar proportion of patients would require adjuvant (chemo)radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, resulting in excessive morbidity. Evaluation of time trends across the past few decades reveals that the advancements in delivery of radiation (external beam and brachytherapy) have translated into improvement in outcomes for locally advanced cervical cancer, while a similar trend was not observed for surgery or chemotherapy.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery cannot be considered a standard of care in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. This approach needs further clinical research to generate robust high-quality evidence especially for the sub-sets that might potentially benefit in terms of survival, toxicity and quality of life, against the gold standard treatment of concomitant chemoradiation.
基于顺铂的同步放化疗是局部晚期宫颈癌的标准治疗方法。鉴于在低收入和中等收入国家实施标准放疗方案存在困难以及放化疗相关的毒性,新辅助化疗后手术已被尝试作为局部晚期宫颈癌的替代治疗方法。
对现有文献进行了全面综述,比较了新辅助化疗后手术与放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的注意事项和潜在途径。
在放化疗时代之前进行的随机研究比较了新辅助化疗后手术与单纯根治性放疗,结果显示化疗 - 手术方法有良好的疗效。然而,评估新辅助化疗后手术作用的当代研究未能将这种方法确立为标准治疗方法。接受新辅助化疗的患者中约25 - 30%仍无法进行手术,需要进行根治性放化疗。在新辅助化疗后手术的患者中,类似比例的患者在术后需要辅助(化疗)放疗,导致发病率过高。对过去几十年时间趋势的评估表明,放疗(外照射和近距离放疗)技术的进步已转化为局部晚期宫颈癌治疗效果的改善,而手术或化疗方面未观察到类似趋势。
新辅助化疗后手术不能被视为局部晚期宫颈癌患者的标准治疗方法。这种方法需要进一步的临床研究,以产生有力的高质量证据,特别是针对那些在生存、毒性和生活质量方面可能潜在受益的亚组患者,与同步放化疗的金标准治疗方法进行对比。