Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Professor, School of Economics and Director, Health Economics and Analytics Lab (HEAL), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Jun;19(6):746-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
The number and roles of US nonphysician practitioners (NPPs) have expanded considerably, but little is known about their use by radiology practices. The authors assessed characteristics and trends of radiology practices employing Medicare-recognized NPPs.
Using Medicare databases from 2017 through 2019, the authors mapped all nurse practitioners and physician assistants (together "NPPs") to employer groups for which all physicians were radiologists ("radiology practices"). Practices were characterized by size, geography, and radiologist characteristics. Temporal changes were assessed, and NPP employment likelihood was estimated using multivariate logistic regression modeling.
As the number of US radiology practices declined by 36.5% (from 2,643 to 1,679) between 2017 and 2019, the number employing NPPs increased by 10.5% (from 228 [8.6%] to 252 [15.0%]). The number of radiologists in NPP-employing practices increased by 10.4% (from 6,596 [35.1%] to 7,282 [40.0%]) as the number of radiology-employed NPPs increased by 17.5% (from 588 to 691). Practices were more likely to employ NPPs when medium (odds ratio [OR], 1.31) or large (OR, 1.25) in size, when urban located (OR, 1.35), and as their percentages of interventional radiologists increased (OR, 5.53 per percentage point) (P < .01 for all). Practices were less likely to employ NPPs as mean radiologist years since completing training increased (OR, 0.99 per year; P < .01).
Employment of NPPs by radiology practices has grown considerably in recent years, particularly in larger and urban practices and in those that employ more interventional and early-career radiologists. More work is necessary to better understand how this expanding use of NPPs affects the specialty.
美国非医师从业者(NPP)的数量和角色大大增加,但人们对放射科实践中使用 NPP 的情况知之甚少。作者评估了 Medicare 认可的 NPP 使用放射科实践的特征和趋势。
使用 2017 年至 2019 年 Medicare 数据库,作者将所有护士从业者和医师助理(统称为“NPP”)映射到所有医生均为放射科医生的雇主群体(“放射科实践”)。实践的特征是规模、地理位置和放射科医生的特征。评估了时间变化,并使用多元逻辑回归模型估计了 NPP 就业的可能性。
2017 年至 2019 年期间,美国放射科实践的数量减少了 36.5%(从 2643 家减少至 1679 家),而雇用 NPP 的数量增加了 10.5%(从 228 家[8.6%]增加至 252 家[15.0%])。NPP 雇用实践中的放射科医生数量增加了 10.4%(从 6596 名[35.1%]增加至 7282 名[40.0%]),而放射科雇用的 NPP 数量增加了 17.5%(从 588 名增加至 691 名)。当规模中等(优势比[OR],1.31)或较大(OR,1.25)、位于城市(OR,1.35)以及介入放射科医生的比例增加(OR,每增加 5.53 个百分点)时,实践更有可能雇用 NPP(P <.01)。随着完成培训的放射科医生平均年限的增加(OR,每年减少 0.99;P <.01),实践雇用 NPP 的可能性降低。
近年来,放射科实践对 NPP 的雇用大幅增加,尤其是在规模较大和位于城市的实践中,以及雇用更多介入和早期职业放射科医生的实践中。需要进一步研究以更好地了解这种对 NPP 使用的扩展如何影响该专业。