Stelzer Julio A A, Mesman Jorrit P, Gsell Alena S, de Senerpont Domis Lisette N, Visser Petra M, Adrian Rita, Ibelings Bastiaan W
Department F.-A Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences Institute for Environmental Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland.
Department of Ecosystem Research Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Berlin Germany.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 1;12(3):e8675. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8675. eCollection 2022 Feb.
While eutrophication remains one of the main pressures acting on freshwater ecosystems, the prevalence of anthropogenic and nature-induced stochastic pulse perturbations is predicted to increase due to climate change. Despite all our knowledge on the effects of eutrophication and stochastic events operating in isolation, we know little about how eutrophication may affect the response and recovery of aquatic ecosystems to pulse perturbations. There are multiple ways in which eutrophication and pulse perturbations may interact to induce potentially synergic changes in the system, for instance, by increasing the amount of nutrients released after a pulse perturbation. Here, we performed a controlled press and pulse perturbation experiment using mesocosms filled with natural lake water to address how eutrophication modulates the phytoplankton response to sequential mortality pulse perturbations; and what is the combined effect of press and pulse perturbations on the resistance and resilience of the phytoplankton community. Our experiment showed that eutrophication increased the scale of the chlorophyll- response to pulse perturbations but did not change the of the response relative to its pre-event condition (resistance). Moreover, the capacity of the community to recover from pulse perturbations was significantly affected by the cumulative effect of sequential pulse perturbations but not by eutrophication itself. By the end of the experiment, some mesocosms could not recover from pulse perturbations, irrespective of the trophic state induced by the press perturbation. While not resisting or recovering any less from pulse perturbations, phytoplankton communities from eutrophying systems showed chlorophyll- levels much higher than non-eutrophying ones. This implies that the higher absolute response to stochastic pulse perturbations in a eutrophying system may increase the already significant risks for water quality (e.g., algal blooms in drinking water supplies), even if the relative scale of the response to pulse perturbations between eutrophying and non-eutrophying systems remains the same.
虽然富营养化仍然是影响淡水生态系统的主要压力之一,但预计由于气候变化,人为和自然引发的随机脉冲扰动的发生率将会增加。尽管我们对富营养化和孤立发生的随机事件的影响已有诸多了解,但对于富营养化如何影响水生生态系统对脉冲扰动的响应和恢复却知之甚少。富营养化和脉冲扰动可能通过多种方式相互作用,从而在系统中引发潜在的协同变化,例如,通过增加脉冲扰动后释放的营养物质数量。在此,我们使用装有天然湖水的中型生态系统进行了一项受控的压力和脉冲扰动实验,以探讨富营养化如何调节浮游植物对连续死亡脉冲扰动的响应;以及压力和脉冲扰动对浮游植物群落的抵抗力和恢复力的综合影响。我们的实验表明,富营养化增加了叶绿素对脉冲扰动的响应幅度,但相对于事件发生前的状态(抵抗力),并未改变响应的斜率。此外,群落从脉冲扰动中恢复的能力受到连续脉冲扰动累积效应的显著影响,而不受富营养化本身的影响。到实验结束时,无论压力扰动所诱导的营养状态如何,一些中型生态系统都无法从脉冲扰动中恢复。虽然在抵抗或从脉冲扰动中恢复方面并不逊色,但富营养化系统中的浮游植物群落的叶绿素水平远高于非富营养化系统。这意味着,即使富营养化系统和非富营养化系统对脉冲扰动的响应相对幅度保持不变,富营养化系统对随机脉冲扰动的更高绝对响应可能会增加已经很严重的水质风险(例如,饮用水供应中的藻华)。