Suppr超能文献

未受伤肢体单侧训练对前交叉韧带重建患者肌肉力量和膝关节功能的有效性:交叉教育的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Unilateral Training of the Uninjured Limb on Muscle Strength and Knee Function of Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Education.

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2022 Mar 12;31(5):605-616. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2021-0204. Print 2022 Jul 1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Unilateral training of the uninjured limb could be a useful therapeutic tool to induce cross-education in periods of immobilization, however, the effectiveness of this training in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of unilateral training of the uninjured limb on muscle strength and knee function in patients with ACL reconstruction.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE, LILACS, CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro databases from inception until March 2021. The authors included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effectiveness of unilateral training of the uninjured limb on muscle strength and knee function in patients after ACL reconstruction.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven clinical trials met the eligibility criteria, and for the quantitative synthesis, 5 studies were included. The standardized mean difference for isometric quadriceps strength was 0.60 at 8 to 12 weeks (95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.92; P = .01; I2 = 6%). There was a high quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating. Four studies assessed knee function through different self-administered questionnaires at 8, 24, and 26 weeks. Only one study reported significant differences in knee function at 8 weeks, favoring the unilateral training group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a moderate to high quality of evidence, with statistical significance that the addition of unilateral training to standard rehabilitation improved the cross-education of quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to assess the consistency of these results. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42020199950.

摘要

背景

在固定期,非受伤肢体的单侧训练可能是一种促进交叉教育的有用治疗工具,但这种训练在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建患者中的有效性尚不清楚。

目的

确定非受伤肢体的单侧训练对 ACL 重建患者的肌肉力量和膝关节功能的有效性。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

证据获取

从建库到 2021 年 3 月,在 MEDLINE、LILACS、CENTRAL、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus 和 PEDro 数据库中进行了电子检索。作者纳入了评估 ACL 重建后单侧训练非受伤肢体对肌肉力量和膝关节功能的有效性的随机临床试验。

证据综合

有 7 项临床试验符合入选标准,有 5 项研究被纳入定量综合分析。8 至 12 周时等长股四头肌力量的标准化均数差为 0.60(95%置信区间,0.29 至 0.92;P =.01;I2 = 6%)。根据推荐评估、制定与评价分级,证据质量为高。4 项研究通过不同的自我管理问卷评估膝关节功能,分别在 8、24 和 26 周进行。只有 1 项研究报告了 8 周时膝关节功能的显著差异,单侧训练组更有优势。

结论

有中等至高质量的证据,具有统计学意义,即标准康复治疗中加入单侧训练可改善 ACL 重建后的股四头肌力量交叉教育。需要更多的研究来评估这些结果的一致性。国际前瞻性注册系统评价号:CRD42020199950。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验