Song Qingfa, Zhang Shuhan, Cheng Xu, Xiao Jian, Lin Lin, Liu Qiang, Shao Zhenxing, Cui Guoqing
Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing, China.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Mar 8;10(3):23259671221076048. doi: 10.1177/23259671221076048. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Some studies have advocated the use of suture button fixation during Bristow-Latarjet surgery to reduce complications associated with screw fixation. However, data comparing these fixation methods are relatively incomplete.
To investigate the efficacy of modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using screw versus suture button fixation.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
We evaluated 136 patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability who underwent the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery between June 2015 and February 2018. Of these patients, 117 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled at a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 0.7 years. Shoulders were separated into 2 groups based on fixation technique: screw fixation (group A; n = 63) or suture button fixation (group B; n = 54). Computed tomography imaging findings and clinical results were assessed preoperatively; immediately after operation; and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up.
There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative clinical scores, the level of return to sports, range of motion, graft position, or reoperation rates. Bone healing was observed in 97.4% of the cases overall (114/117), with 98.4% bone union in group A and 96.3% in group B at final follow-up. Bone absorption was more common in group A (n = 30; 47.6%) compared with group B (n = 10; 18.5%) ( = .003). There were no hardware-related complications in group B, compared with 7.9% of patients in group A ( = .034). One patient in group B had a recurrent dislocation due to an unexpected event, and there were no recurrent dislocations in group A.
After the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure, both suture button and screw fixation methods demonstrated high bony healing rates and low risk of recurrence. Less coracoid graft resorption and no hardware-related complications were seen with suture button fixation.
一些研究主张在布里斯托-拉塔热手术中使用缝线纽扣固定,以减少与螺钉固定相关的并发症。然而,比较这些固定方法的数据相对不完整。
探讨改良关节镜下布里斯托-拉塔热手术的疗效,并比较使用螺钉与缝线纽扣固定的临床和影像学结果。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
我们评估了2015年6月至2018年2月期间接受改良关节镜下布里斯托-拉塔热手术的136例创伤性前肩关节不稳患者。其中,117例符合纳入标准的患者在平均3.3±0.7年的随访中被纳入研究。根据固定技术将肩关节分为两组:螺钉固定(A组;n = 63)或缝线纽扣固定(B组;n = 54)。术前、术后即刻、术后3个月、6个月、1年及最终随访时评估计算机断层扫描成像结果和临床结果。
两组在术后临床评分、恢复运动水平、活动范围、移植物位置或再次手术率方面无显著差异。总体97.4%的病例观察到骨愈合(114/117),最终随访时A组骨愈合率为98.4%,B组为96.3%。与B组(n = 10;18.5%)相比,A组骨吸收更常见(n = 30;47.6%)(P = 0.003)。B组无与硬件相关的并发症,而A组为7.9%(P = 0.034)。B组1例患者因意外事件出现复发性脱位,A组无复发性脱位。
改良关节镜下布里斯托-拉塔热手术后,缝线纽扣和螺钉固定方法均显示出高骨愈合率和低复发风险。缝线纽扣固定的喙突移植物吸收较少,且无与硬件相关的并发症。