Bissonnette Josiane, Dumont Emilie, Pinard Anne-Marie, Landry Mathieu, Rainville Pierre, Ogez David
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Faculty of Music, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e503-e514. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003551.
Maintaining quality of life is a primary goal of palliative care (PC). Complementary interventions can help meet the needs of patients at the end of life.
This meta-analysis aims to (1) evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of music and hypnosis interventions designed for patients in PC and (2) evaluate the impact of these interventions on pain, anxiety, sleep and well-being.
Relevant studies were sourced from major databases. We selected both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and studies relying on pre-post design with details of the intervention(s).
Four RCT and seven non-randomised pre-post studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions reached an adequate level of satisfaction. However, only three studies reported using a written protocol. The meta-analysis of RCT indicated a significant decrease in pain with an effect size of -0.42, p=0.003. The small number of RCT studies did not allow us to quantify the effects for other variables. Analyses of data from pre-post designs indicated a favourable outcome for pain, anxiety, sleep and well-being.
Despite the limited number of studies included in our meta-analysis, hypnosis and music intervention in the context of PC shows promising results in terms of feasibility and acceptability, as well as improvements on pain, anxiety, sleep and well-being. The available studies are insufficient to compare the efficacy across interventions and assess the potential benefits of their combinations. These results underscore the importance of further research on well-described complementary interventions relying on hypnosis and music.
CRD-42021236610.
维持生活质量是姑息治疗(PC)的主要目标。辅助干预措施有助于满足临终患者的需求。
本荟萃分析旨在(1)评估为PC患者设计的音乐和催眠干预措施的可行性、可接受性和保真度,以及(2)评估这些干预措施对疼痛、焦虑、睡眠和幸福感的影响。
从主要数据库中获取相关研究。我们选择了随机对照试验(RCT)和采用前后设计并详细描述干预措施的研究。
四项RCT和七项非随机前后研究符合纳入标准。总体而言,干预措施的可行性和可接受性达到了足够的满意度水平。然而,只有三项研究报告使用了书面方案。RCT的荟萃分析表明疼痛显著减轻,效应大小为-0.42,p = 0.003。RCT研究数量较少,无法对其他变量的影响进行量化。前后设计的数据分析表明,在疼痛、焦虑、睡眠和幸福感方面有良好的结果。
尽管我们的荟萃分析纳入的研究数量有限,但PC背景下的催眠和音乐干预在可行性和可接受性方面显示出有希望的结果,以及在疼痛、焦虑、睡眠和幸福感方面有所改善。现有研究不足以比较不同干预措施的疗效,也无法评估其联合使用的潜在益处。这些结果强调了进一步研究详细描述的基于催眠和音乐的辅助干预措施的重要性。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD-42021236610。