From The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Bhayana, Sanghavi, and Giladi), Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC (Bhayana), Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Hinsdale, IL (Ghodasra), MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD (Sanghavi), and Johns Hopkins Department of Plastic Surgery, Baltimore, MD (Aliu).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun 15;30(12):e886-e893. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00767. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
On January 1, 2019, in an effort to improve price transparency, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandated that hospitals display chargemasters and pricing for diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) online. We examined the compliance of the 50 top orthopaedic hospitals, ranked by US News, with CMS's mandate and compared pricing.
The chargemaster and pricing of DRG codes related to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) (469, 470, 461, 462, 466, 467, and 468) were evaluated in the top 50 orthopaedic hospitals in the United States. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were used to evaluate the association between DRG 469, 470, and 467 prices with geographic practice cost index (GPCI) work and practice expense values.
Thirty-six of the 50 hospitals reported DRG pricing for THA and TKA. Of these hospitals, 15 had prices for all seven DRGs of interest; only 467, 469, and 470 were reported across all the 36 hospitals. Of the 14 hospitals without DRG information, 12 had nothing and two had unsatisfactory reporting. Prices for DRGs 469, 470, and 467 were moderately or weakly correlated with both GPCI work and GPCI practice expense. All correlation analyses were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
In summary, compliance with CMS's 2019 rule was poor overall. Fourteen of the 50 hospitals did not adequately report any DRG pricing, and only 15 of the hospitals were fully compliant with the mandate. In addition to poor compliance, the reported costs had variation not strongly accounted for by established geographic differences.
2019 年 1 月 1 日,为了提高价格透明度,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)要求医院在网上公布主收费表和诊断相关组(DRG)的定价。我们检查了美国新闻排名前 50 的骨科医院中 50 家医院对 CMS 指令的遵守情况,并比较了定价。
评估了美国前 50 家骨科医院中与全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)相关的 DRG 代码(469、470、461、462、466、467 和 468)的主收费表和定价。使用 Spearman 秩相关系数(ρ)评估 DRG 469、470 和 467 价格与地理实践成本指数(GPCI)工作和实践费用值之间的相关性。
50 家医院中有 36 家报告了 THA 和 TKA 的 DRG 定价。在这些医院中,有 15 家医院报告了所有 7 个感兴趣的 DRG 价格;只有 467、469 和 470 在所有 36 家医院中均有报告。在没有 DRG 信息的 14 家医院中,有 12 家医院没有任何报告,有 2 家医院的报告不尽如人意。DRG 469、470 和 467 的价格与 GPCI 工作和 GPCI 实践费用呈中度或弱相关。所有相关性分析均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
总之,总体而言,对 CMS 2019 年规定的遵守情况很差。50 家医院中有 14 家医院没有充分报告任何 DRG 定价,只有 15 家医院完全遵守了该指令。除了遵守情况不佳外,报告的成本变化与既定的地理差异没有很强的关联。