Dual-layer spectral detector CT for contrast agent concentration, dose and injection rate reduction: Utility in imaging of the superior mesenteric artery.

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of contrast agent and injection rate reduction for dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) imaging of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using virtual monochromatic image (VMI).

METHODS

A total of 102 patients who underwent abdominal arterial phase-enhanced SDCT examination due to suspected abdominal diseases were prospectively selected and divided into control group, low concentration/dose groups (groups 370-0.7, 300-1.0, and 300-0.9) and low injection rate groups (groups 2-370 and 2-350). Compared with the control group, low concentration/dose groups and low injection rate groups lowered the concentration/dose or injection rate of the contrast agent to varying degrees. The raw data obtained in each group were reconstructed using hybrid-iterative reconstruction and projection spatial-spectral reconstruction algorithm. The image quality of the SMA in conventional images (CI) and in VMIs (interval: 10 keV) during the arterial phase was analyzed. Multiplanar reformation images and volume rendering images of the SMA were reconstructed. Image quality objective evaluation indexes included the CT values, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and diameter of the SMA. The diameter of the SMA was determined by the CT values profile curve and its full width at half maximum. Two doctors independently evaluated the subjective image quality of multiplanar reformation coronal images and volume rendering images according to a 5-point scale. Repeated analysis of variance and Friedman test were used to compare the differences in the objective evaluation indexes and subjective scores between VMIs and CI in the same group. The Dunnett's t-test or Dunnett's T3 test and Kruskal-Wallis H-test were used to compare the differences in the objective evaluation indexes and subjective scores between the experimental and control groups.

RESULTS

VMIs of the SMA in each group had the best image quality at 60 keV, and VMI in each group were better than their respective CI to varying degrees. Although the objective (CT values, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio) and subjective (subjective scores) indexes of CI in the low concentration/dose groups and low injection rate groups were lower than those of CI in the control group to varying degrees, these indexes of VMI in the low concentration/dose groups and group 2-370 were equal to or even better than the CI in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

VMI using SDCT could effectively reduce the contrast agent load while providing equivalent or better SMA image quality compared with CI obtained using a conventional contrast agent protocol. When the injection rate was lowered to 2.0 ml/s for a high-concentration contrast agent (370 mgI/ml), the SMA image quality at VMI was comparable with that of the CI in the control group.