Salcido Celina A, Argenbright Cassie M, Aguirre Tiffany, Trujillo Alex D, Fuchs Perry N
University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 20;2:793958. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.793958. eCollection 2021.
Pain is a subjective, private, yet universal phenomenon that depends on a unique combination of sensory, affective, and evaluative characteristics. Although preclinical models have been used to understand much of pain physiology, the inability to communicate with animals limits affective and evaluative feedback and has constrained traditional behavioral methods to adequately represent and study the multidimensional pain experience. Therefore, this study sought to characterize the affective component of pain within a novel operant approach-avoidance paradigm (AAP) to determine which type of pain (inflammatory and neuropathic) may be more aversive. To reveal the possible differences in pain aversiveness within the AAP paradigm, animals received bilateral inflammatory and neuropathic pain conditions and were given the choice to a) forgo appetitive reward by not receiving noxious stimulus of either inflammatory or neuropathic conditions or b) receive noxious stimulus in exchange for an appetitive reward. Although all pain conditions produced significant hypersensitivity, the AAP results revealed there was no preference in the stimulation of a specific paw in the bilateral pain conditions. The finding suggests that despite unique clinical pain characteristics for inflammatory and neuropathic conditions, the lack of observable differences in the pain conditions may not necessarily equate to the overall similarity in aversiveness, but rather that the fixed ratio (FR1) paradigm presentation allowed appetitive reward to be more salient, highlighting the complexities of competing motivational drives of pain and hunger when satiating hunger is always guaranteed. Thus, future studies should seek to further tease apart this relationship with a different schedule and food-controlled methodologies. The development of such preclinical approaches can thoroughly investigate the intricacy of competing drives and likely reveal important information regarding the complexity of pain, enhancing our understanding of pain perception in individuals suffering from comorbid pain states.
疼痛是一种主观、私密但普遍存在的现象,它取决于感觉、情感和评价特征的独特组合。尽管临床前模型已被用于理解疼痛生理学的许多方面,但无法与动物交流限制了情感和评价反馈,并限制了传统行为方法充分表征和研究多维疼痛体验。因此,本研究试图在一种新颖的操作性趋避范式(AAP)中表征疼痛的情感成分,以确定哪种类型的疼痛(炎症性和神经性)可能更令人厌恶。为了揭示AAP范式中疼痛厌恶的可能差异,动物接受双侧炎症性和神经性疼痛条件,并被给予选择:a)通过不接受炎症或神经性条件的有害刺激来放弃食欲奖励,或b)接受有害刺激以换取食欲奖励。尽管所有疼痛条件都产生了显著的超敏反应,但AAP结果显示,在双侧疼痛条件下,对特定爪子的刺激没有偏好。这一发现表明,尽管炎症性和神经性条件具有独特的临床疼痛特征,但疼痛条件中缺乏可观察到的差异不一定等同于厌恶程度的总体相似性,而是固定比率(FR1)范式呈现使食欲奖励更加突出,突出了在始终保证满足饥饿时疼痛和饥饿的竞争动机驱动的复杂性。因此,未来的研究应寻求用不同的时间表和食物控制方法进一步梳理这种关系。这种临床前方法的发展可以彻底研究竞争驱动的复杂性,并可能揭示有关疼痛复杂性的重要信息,增强我们对患有合并疼痛状态个体的疼痛感知的理解。