Yoshida Takeshi, Engelberts Doreen, Chen Han, Li Xuehan, Katira Bhushan H, Otulakowski Gail, Fujino Yuji
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Translational Medicine Program, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2022 May 1;136(5):779-791. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004165.
Vigorous spontaneous effort can potentially worsen lung injury. This study hypothesized that the prone position would diminish a maldistribution of lung stress and inflation after diaphragmatic contraction and reduce spontaneous effort, resulting in less lung injury.
A severe acute respiratory distress syndrome model was established by depleting surfactant and injurious mechanical ventilation in 6 male pigs ("mechanism" protocol) and 12 male rabbits ("lung injury" protocol). In the mechanism protocol, regional inspiratory negative pleural pressure swing (intrabronchial balloon manometry) and the corresponding lung inflation (electrical impedance tomography) were measured with a combination of position (supine or prone) and positive end-expiratory pressure (high or low) matching the intensity of spontaneous effort. In the lung injury protocol, the intensities of spontaneous effort (esophageal manometry) and regional lung injury were compared in the supine position versus prone position.
The mechanism protocol (pigs) found that in the prone position, there was no ventral-to-dorsal gradient in negative pleural pressure swing after diaphragmatic contraction, irrespective of the positive end-expiratory pressure level (-10.3 ± 3.3 cm H2O vs. -11.7 ± 2.4 cm H2O at low positive end-expiratory pressure, P = 0.115; -10.4 ± 3.4 cm H2O vs. -10.8 ± 2.3 cm H2O at high positive end-expiratory pressure, P = 0.715), achieving homogeneous inflation. In the supine position, however, spontaneous effort during low positive end-expiratory pressure had the largest ventral-to-dorsal gradient in negative pleural pressure swing (-9.8 ± 2.9 cm H2O vs. -18.1 ± 4.0 cm H2O, P < 0.001), causing dorsal overdistension. Higher positive end-expiratory pressure in the supine position reduced a ventral-to-dorsal gradient in negative pleural pressure swing, but it remained (-9.9 ± 2.8 cm H2O vs. -13.3 ± 2.3 cm H2O, P < 0.001). The lung injury protocol (rabbits) found that in the prone position, spontaneous effort was milder and lung injury was less without regional difference (lung myeloperoxidase activity in ventral vs. dorsal lung, 74.0 ± 30.9 μm · min-1 · mg-1 protein vs. 61.0 ± 23.0 μm · min-1 · mg-1 protein, P = 0.951). In the supine position, stronger spontaneous effort increased dorsal lung injury (lung myeloperoxidase activity in ventral vs. dorsal lung, 67.5 ± 38.1 μm · min-1 · mg-1 protein vs. 167.7 ± 65.5 μm · min-1 · mg-1 protein, P = 0.003).
Prone position, independent of positive end-expiratory pressure levels, diminishes a maldistribution of lung stress and inflation imposed by spontaneous effort and mitigates spontaneous effort, resulting in less effort-dependent lung injury.
剧烈的自主用力可能会加重肺损伤。本研究假设俯卧位会减少膈肌收缩后肺应力和充气的分布不均,并减少自主用力,从而减少肺损伤。
通过在6只雄性猪(“机制”方案)和12只雄性兔(“肺损伤”方案)中消耗表面活性物质和采用有害机械通气建立严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征模型。在“机制”方案中,结合体位(仰卧或俯卧)和呼气末正压(高或低)与自主用力强度相匹配,测量局部吸气性胸膜负压摆动(支气管内气囊测压法)和相应的肺充气(电阻抗断层成像)。在“肺损伤”方案中,比较仰卧位和俯卧位时的自主用力强度(食管测压法)和局部肺损伤情况。
“机制”方案(猪)发现,在俯卧位时,膈肌收缩后胸膜负压摆动不存在腹侧到背侧的梯度,与呼气末正压水平无关(低呼气末正压时为-10.3±3.3 cmH₂O对-11.7±2.4 cmH₂O,P = 0.115;高呼气末正压时为-10.4±3.4 cmH₂O对-10.8±2.3 cmH₂O,P = 0.715),实现了均匀充气。然而,在仰卧位时,低呼气末正压期间的自主用力使胸膜负压摆动的腹侧到背侧梯度最大(-9.8±2.9 cmH₂O对-18.1±4.0 cmH₂O,P<0.001),导致背侧过度扩张。仰卧位时较高的呼气末正压降低了胸膜负压摆动的腹侧到背侧梯度,但仍然存在(-9.9±2.8 cmH₂O对-13.3±2.3 cmH₂O,P<0.001)。“肺损伤”方案(兔)发现,在俯卧位时,自主用力较轻,肺损伤较小且无局部差异(腹侧肺与背侧肺的肺髓过氧化物酶活性,74.0±30.9μm·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹蛋白对61.0±23.0μm·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹蛋白,P = 0.951)。在仰卧位时,较强的自主用力增加了背侧肺损伤(腹侧肺与背侧肺的肺髓过氧化物酶活性,67.5±38.1μm·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹蛋白对167.7±65.5μm·min⁻¹·mg⁻¹蛋白,P = 0.003)。
俯卧位,与呼气末正压水平无关,可减少自主用力引起的肺应力和充气分布不均,并减轻自主用力,从而减少用力依赖性肺损伤。