Department of Health Care Administration, Chang Jung Christian University, Taiwan.
Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jul 11;62(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac114.
The goal of this study was to investigate the overall survival between open and thoracoscopic oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).
The Taiwan Cancer Registry was queried for ESCC from 2008 to 2016. We enrolled 2250 patients with ESCC receiving NCRT plus open (n = 487) or thoracoscopic (n = 1763) oesophagectomy. One-to-two propensity score matching between open and thoracoscopic oesophagectomy was performed. Overall survival was compared between the 2 groups before and after propensity score matching. Univariable analysis and multivariable analysis were performed to identify prognostic factors.
After one-to-two propensity score matching, 353 patients were in the open group and 706 patients were in the thoracoscopic group. The 3-year overall survival rates for matched patients treated with open or thoracoscopic oesophagectomy were similar (39.18% vs 44.33%, p = 0.11). Better overall survival was associated with thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for the patients in the y-pathological complete response stage (pCR) (57.26% vs 65.19%, p = 0.045), y-pathological III stage (12.78% vs 22.31%, p = 0.028) and y-pathological T0N+ stage (15.79% vs 41.01%, p = 0.010). In multivariable analysis, surgical approach was an independent prognostic factor only before propensity score matching. After matching, surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor.
This propensity-matched study demonstrated that open and thoracoscopic oesophagectomies are associated with similar long-term survival in patients with ESCC undergoing NCRT. Stage-specific comparisons showed that thoracoscopic oesophagectomy is associated with better survival than open oesophagectomy in patients with the pathological complete response, y-pathological III and y-pathological T0N+ stages and with similar survival in y-pathological I/II patients.
本研究旨在探讨接受新辅助放化疗(NCRT)的食管鳞癌(ESCC)患者中开放与胸腔镜食管切除术的总生存率。
从 2008 年至 2016 年,台湾癌症登记处对 ESCC 进行了查询。我们纳入了 2250 例接受 NCRT 加开放(n = 487)或胸腔镜(n = 1763)食管切除术的 ESCC 患者。对开放和胸腔镜食管切除术进行了 1:2 的倾向评分匹配。比较了两组在倾向评分匹配前后的总生存率。进行单变量分析和多变量分析以确定预后因素。
经过 1:2 的倾向评分匹配后,353 例患者在开放组,706 例患者在胸腔镜组。接受开放或胸腔镜食管切除术的匹配患者的 3 年总生存率相似(39.18%比 44.33%,p = 0.11)。对于 y 期病理完全缓解(pCR)(57.26%比 65.19%,p = 0.045)、y 期病理 III 期(12.78%比 22.31%,p = 0.028)和 y 期病理 T0N+期(15.79%比 41.01%,p = 0.010)的患者,胸腔镜食管切除术与更好的总生存率相关。多变量分析显示,手术方式仅在倾向评分匹配前是独立的预后因素。匹配后,手术方式不是独立的预后因素。
这项倾向评分匹配研究表明,接受 NCRT 的 ESCC 患者中,开放和胸腔镜食管切除术与相似的长期生存相关。基于特定分期的比较显示,在 y 期病理完全缓解、y 期病理 III 期和 y 期病理 T0N+期患者中,胸腔镜食管切除术与开放食管切除术相比生存率更好,而在 y 期病理 I/II 期患者中生存率相似。