Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Sciences University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel; Cognetica: the Israeli Center for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Cognetica: the Israeli Center for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 May;149:266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.02.037. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may report Sensory Over Responsivity (SOR), but evidence for specific shared mechanism is limited. This study investigated a habituation-sensitivity mechanism in individuals with OCD (n = 30). Sensory habituation and sensitivity were compared with a neurotypical sample, divided to high (n = 30) and low (n = 30) obsessive-compulsive symptoms (HOCS and LOCS). Participants completed self-report sensory questionnaires and a physiological protocol measuring Electro Dermal Activity (EDA) while presenting aversive and neutral sounds in two conditions: Aversive stimuli followed by neutral stimuli (AVfirst), or neutral stimuli followed by aversive stimuli (NEfirst). In addition, participants could shorten the stimulus duration by pressing a key. LOCS differed from HOCS and OCD in most sensory self-report scores, with no significant difference between OCD and HOCS. HOCS had no significant differences in habituation patterns across conditions, while OCD had no differences in habituation patterns in AVfirst (p = .08) but significantly slower habituation patterns to the NEfirst neutral stimuli (p < .001). Condition order determined sensitivity for LOCS (AVfirst p = .017; NEfirst p = .045) but not for OCD and HOCS. HOCS and OCD shortened aversive stimuli by key pressing more than LOCS, with no significant difference between OCD and HOCS. The habituation process of individuals with OCD and HOCS was more influenced by stimulus type than by condition order, which might be due to a cognitive bias of prediction. Individuals with elevated OCS have difficulty relying upon sensory input to respond adaptively to the environment. This process can explain the avoidant behavior and complains of individuals with OCD not being able to ignore and to habituate to the sensory environment. These evidence warrants design of psychoeducation and intervention methods for relying on prior sensory information to improve functioning in individuals with OCD and SOR.
患有强迫症(OCD)的个体可能会报告感觉过度反应(SOR),但特定的共同机制证据有限。本研究调查了 OCD 个体中的一种习惯化-敏感性机制(n=30)。将感觉习惯化和敏感性与神经典型样本进行了比较,该样本分为高(n=30)和低(n=30)强迫症症状(HOCS 和 LOCS)。参与者完成了自我报告的感觉问卷,并在呈现厌恶性和中性声音的两种情况下完成了生理协议,即:厌恶性刺激后接中性刺激(AVfirst),或中性刺激后接厌恶性刺激(NEfirst)。此外,参与者可以通过按键来缩短刺激持续时间。LOCs 在大多数感觉自我报告评分上与 HOCs 和 OCD 不同,而 OCD 和 HOCs 之间没有显著差异。HOCs 在所有条件下的习惯化模式均无显著差异,而 OCD 在 AVfirst 条件下的习惯化模式无差异(p=0.08),但对 NEfirst 中性刺激的习惯化模式明显较慢(p<0.001)。条件顺序决定了 LOCs 的敏感性(AVfirst p=0.017;NEfirst p=0.045),但对 OCD 和 HOCS 则没有影响。HOCs 和 OCD 通过按键比 LOCs 更频繁地缩短厌恶性刺激,而 OCD 和 HOCS 之间没有显著差异。HOCs 和 OCD 个体的习惯化过程受刺激类型的影响大于条件顺序,这可能是由于预测的认知偏差。OCS 升高的个体在依赖感觉输入对环境做出适应性反应方面存在困难。这一过程可以解释 OCD 个体不能忽略和习惯化感觉环境的回避行为和抱怨。这些证据证明了设计心理教育和干预方法的合理性,以便个体能够依赖先前的感觉信息来改善 OCD 和 SOR 个体的功能。