Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,意大利医护人员因个人防护设备而出现的皮肤不良反应。

Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic in Italian health care workers.

机构信息

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", "A. Fiorini" Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Terracina, Italy.

Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jun;35(6):e15460. doi: 10.1111/dth.15460. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Abstract

To avoid exposure to SARS-COV-2, healthcare professionals must use personal protective equipment (PPE). Their use has been related to a series of adverse effects; the most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspnoea, and pressure injuries. Skin adverse effects are very common, including contact dermatitis, itching, erythema, and acneiform eruptions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the skin problems caused by personal protection equipment (PPE) in health care workers (HCWs) and to individuate eventual risk factors. From May to June 2020 a retrospective observational multi-centric study conducted by an online survey sent by email, involving 10 hospital centers, was performed. We considered as independent variables gender and age, occupational group and sector, time of utilization, type and material of PPE. We tested 3 types of PPE: gloves, bonnet, and mask for different time of utilization (<1, 1-3, 3-6, >6 h). We performed a multiple logistic regression model to correlate them with skin adverse events occurrence. Among all the 1184 participants, 292 workers reported a dermatological pathology: 45 (15.41%) had psoriasis, 54 (18.49%) eczema, 38 (13.01%) acne, 48 (16.44%) seborrheic dermatitis, and 107 (36.64%) other. In our sample previous inflammatory dermatological conditions, female sex, prolonged use of PPE were significant risk factors for developing skin related adverse events considering all the PPE considered. The use of PPE is still mandatory in the hospital setting and skin adverse reactions still represent a global problem. Although data from Europe are limited, our study highlighted the importance of the problem of PPE skin reactions in a large sample of Italian healthcare professionals.

摘要

为避免接触 SARS-CoV-2,医护人员必须使用个人防护装备(PPE)。其使用与一系列不良反应有关;最常见的不良事件是头痛、呼吸困难和压疮。皮肤不良反应非常常见,包括接触性皮炎、瘙痒、红斑和痤疮样疹。本研究旨在评估个人防护装备(PPE)在医护人员中引起的皮肤问题,并确定潜在的危险因素。2020 年 5 月至 6 月,我们通过电子邮件进行了一项回顾性观察性多中心研究,涉及 10 家医院中心。我们将性别和年龄、职业群体和部门、使用时间、PPE 的类型和材料作为自变量。我们测试了 3 种 PPE:手套、头罩和口罩,使用时间分别为<1、1-3、3-6、>6 小时。我们进行了多因素逻辑回归模型分析,将其与皮肤不良反应的发生相关联。在所有 1184 名参与者中,292 名工作人员报告了皮肤病:45 名(15.41%)患有银屑病,54 名(18.49%)患有湿疹,38 名(13.01%)患有痤疮,48 名(16.44%)患有脂溢性皮炎,107 名(36.64%)患有其他疾病。在我们的样本中,先前的炎症性皮肤病、女性、长时间使用 PPE 是所有考虑的 PPE 发生皮肤相关不良反应的显著危险因素。在医院环境中,PPE 的使用仍然是强制性的,皮肤不良反应仍然是一个全球性问题。尽管欧洲的数据有限,但我们的研究强调了 PPE 皮肤反应问题在意大利大量医护人员中的重要性。

相似文献

1
Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic in Italian health care workers.
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jun;35(6):e15460. doi: 10.1111/dth.15460. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Personal protective equipment related skin reactions in healthcare professionals during COVID-19.
Int Wound J. 2021 Jun;18(3):312-322. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13534. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
4
The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603.
6
Skin adverse events related to personal protective equipment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1994-2006. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17436. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Skin problems related to personal protective equipment among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic (online research).
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021 Sep;40(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2021.1902340. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Prescribing and Dispensing of Oral Isotretinoin and Noncompliance with Recommendations in France before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jun;15(6):1533-1541. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01409-y. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
2
Return to work after Post-COVID: describing affected employees' perceptions of personal resources, organizational offerings and care pathways.
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 27;11:1282507. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282507. eCollection 2023.
4
Contact dermatitis caused by prevention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1189190. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189190. eCollection 2023.
8
Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic on Dermatology Outpatient Department at a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern China: A Pre-Post Study.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Nov 18;15:2507-2518. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S389496. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Skin adverse events related to personal protective equipment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1994-2006. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17436. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
4
Who is wearing a mask? Gender-, age-, and location-related differences during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240785. eCollection 2020.
5
Gender, face mask perceptions, and face mask wearing: Are men being dangerous during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110417. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110417. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
Seborrheic dermatitis and anti-COVID-19 masks.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Oct;19(10):2464-2465. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13669. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
9
Irritant contact dermatitis in healthcare workers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Jan;46(1):142-144. doi: 10.1111/ced.14397. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
10
The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验