Masè Michela, Werner Andreas, Putzer Gabriel, Avancini Giovanni, Falla Marika, Brugger Hermann, Micarelli Alessandro, Strapazzon Giacomo
Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Institute of Physiology, Center for Space Medicine and Extreme Environments Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 4;13:830059. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.830059. eCollection 2022.
Indirect core body temperature (CBT) monitoring from skin sensors is gaining attention for in-field applications thanks to non-invasivity, portability, and easy probe positioning. Among skin sensors, heat-flux devices, such as the so-called Double Sensor (DS), have demonstrated reliability under various experimental and clinical conditions. Still, their accuracy at low ambient temperatures is unknown. In this randomized cross-over trial, we tested the effects of cold temperature exposition on DS performance in tracking CBT.
Twenty-one participants were exposed to a warm (23.2 ± 0.4°C) and cold (-18.7 ± 1.0°C) room condition for 10 min, following a randomized cross-over design. The accuracy of the DS to estimate CBT in both settings was assessed by quantitative comparison with esophageal (reference) and tympanic (comparator) thermometers, using Bland-Altman and correlation analyses (Pearson's correlation coefficient, , and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, ).
In the warm room setting, the DS showed a moderate agreement with the esophageal sensor [bias = 0.09 (-1.51; 1.69) °C, = 0.40 ( = 0.069), CCC = 0.22 (-0.006; 0.43)] and tympanic sensor [bias = 2.74 (1.13; 4.35) °C, = 0.54 ( < 0.05), CCC = 0.09 (0.008; 0.16)]. DS accuracy significantly deteriorated in the cold room setting, where DS temperature overestimated esophageal temperature [bias = 2.16 (-0.89; 5.22) °C, = 0.02 (0.94), CCC = 0.002 (-0.05; 0.06)]. Previous exposition to the cold influenced temperature values measured by the DS in the warm room setting, where significant differences ( < 0.00001) in DS temperature were observed between randomization groups.
DS accuracy is influenced by environmental conditions and previous exposure to cold settings. These results suggest the present inadequacy of the DS device for in-field applications in low-temperature environments and advocate further technological advancements and proper sensor insulation to improve performance in these conditions.
由于具有非侵入性、便携性和易于探头定位的特点,通过皮肤传感器进行间接核心体温(CBT)监测在现场应用中越来越受到关注。在皮肤传感器中,热通量设备,如所谓的双传感器(DS),已在各种实验和临床条件下证明了其可靠性。然而,其在低温环境下的准确性尚不清楚。在这项随机交叉试验中,我们测试了低温暴露对DS跟踪CBT性能的影响。
21名参与者按照随机交叉设计,在温暖(23.2±0.4°C)和寒冷(-18.7±1.0°C)的房间条件下各暴露10分钟。通过与食管(参考)温度计和鼓膜(比较)温度计进行定量比较,使用Bland-Altman分析和相关性分析(Pearson相关系数、和Lin一致性相关系数)来评估DS在两种环境下估计CBT的准确性。
在温暖的房间环境中,DS与食管传感器显示出中等程度的一致性[偏差=0.09(-1.51;1.69)°C,=0.40(=0.069),CCC=0.22(-0.006;0.43)],与鼓膜传感器的一致性为[偏差=2.74(1.13;4.35)°C,=0.54(<0.05),CCC=0.09(0.008;0.16)]。在寒冷的房间环境中,DS的准确性显著下降,此时DS温度高估了食管温度[偏差=2.16(-0.89;5.22)°C,=0.02(0.94),CCC=0.002(-0.05;0.06)]。先前暴露于寒冷环境会影响DS在温暖房间环境中测量的温度值,随机分组之间观察到DS温度存在显著差异(<0.00001)。
DS的准确性受环境条件和先前暴露于寒冷环境的影响。这些结果表明,目前DS设备在低温环境下的现场应用存在不足,提倡进一步的技术进步和适当的传感器绝缘措施,以改善这些条件下的性能。