Pinho Catarina J, Lopes Evandro P, Paupério Joana, Gomes Isildo, Romeiras Maria M, Vasconcelos Raquel
CIBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.
Departamento de Biologia Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 7;12(3):e8638. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8638. eCollection 2022 Feb.
DNA metabarcoding is widely used to characterize the diet of species, and it becomes very relevant for biodiversity conservation, allowing the understanding of trophic chains and the impact of invasive species. The need for cost-effective biodiversity monitoring methods fostered advances in this technique. One question that arises is which sample type provides a better diet representation.Therefore, with this study, we intended to evaluate if there were differences in diet estimates according to the section of the gastrointestinal tract analysed and which section(s) provided the best diet representation. Additionally, we intended to infer the ecological/economic impacts of an invader as a model of the potential effects in an originally mammal-free ecosystem.We examined the gut contents of the house mouse introduced to Cabo Verde, considering three sections: stomach, small intestine, and large intestine. We applied a DNA-metabarcoding approach using two genetic markers, one specific for plants and another for invertebrates.We showed that this invader consumed 131 taxa (73 plants and 58 invertebrates). We obtained significant differences in the composition of two of the three sections, with a higher incidence of invertebrates in the stomach and plants in the intestines. This may be due to stomach inhibitors acting on plants and/or to faster absorption of soft-body invertebrates compared to the plant fibers in the intestines. We verified that the impact of this invader in the ecosystem is predominantly negative, as at least 50% of the ingested items were native, endemic, or economically important taxa, and only 19% of the diet items were exotics.Overall, results showed the need to analyse only two gastrointestinal tract sections to obtain robust diet data, increasing the cost-effectiveness of the method. Furthermore, by uncovering the native taxa most frequently preyed on by mice, this DNA-metabarcoding approach allowed us to evaluate efficiently which are at the highest risk.
DNA 宏条形码技术被广泛用于描述物种的饮食结构,对于生物多样性保护具有重要意义,有助于了解营养链以及入侵物种的影响。对具有成本效益的生物多样性监测方法的需求推动了该技术的发展。由此产生的一个问题是哪种样本类型能更好地代表饮食结构。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估根据所分析的胃肠道部分,饮食估计是否存在差异,以及哪个部分能提供最佳的饮食结构代表性。此外,我们打算以一种入侵物种为例,推断其在原本没有哺乳动物的生态系统中的潜在影响对生态/经济的影响。我们研究了引入佛得角的家鼠的肠道内容物,考虑了三个部分:胃、小肠和大肠。我们应用了一种 DNA 宏条形码方法,使用两种遗传标记,一种针对植物,另一种针对无脊椎动物。我们发现这种入侵物种消耗了 131 个分类单元(73 种植物和 58 种无脊椎动物)。我们在三个部分中的两个部分的组成上发现了显著差异,胃中无脊椎动物的发生率较高,而肠道中植物的发生率较高。这可能是由于胃中的抑制剂作用于植物,和/或与肠道中的植物纤维相比,软体无脊椎动物的吸收更快。我们证实,这种入侵物种对生态系统的影响主要是负面的,因为至少 50%的摄入物是本地、特有或具有经济重要性的分类单元,而只有 19%的食物是外来物种。总体而言,结果表明只需分析两个胃肠道部分就能获得可靠的饮食数据,提高了该方法的成本效益。此外,通过揭示家鼠最常捕食的本地分类单元,这种 DNA 宏条形码方法使我们能够有效地评估哪些分类单元面临的风险最高。