Suppr超能文献

系统评价与Meta分析:生物制剂与小分子药物联合应用于炎症性肠病的安全性和有效性

Systematic Review With Meta-analysis: Safety and Effectiveness of Combining Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

作者信息

Alayo Quazim A, Fenster Marc, Altayar Osama, Glassner Kerri L, Llano Ernesto, Clark-Snustad Kindra, Patel Anish, Kwapisz Lukasz, Yarur Andres J, Cohen Benjamin L, Ciorba Matthew A, Thomas Deborah, Lee Scott D, Loftus Edward V, Fudman David I, Abraham Bincy P, Colombel Jean-Frederic, Deepak Parakkal

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Centre, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Crohns Colitis 360. 2022 Feb 10;4(1):otac002. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otac002. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT), or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical trials.gov until November 3, 2020, including studies with 2 or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT. Main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic, and/or radiographic response and remission. The certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

Of the 3688 publications identified, 13 studies (1 clinical trial, 12 observational studies) involving 266 patients on 7 different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0 to 4, and median duration of follow-up was 16-68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF, = 56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, = 57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-21.4) for VDZ-aTNF and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0-7.6) for Tofa-VDZ. The overall certainty of evidence was very low due to the observational nature of the studies, and very serious imprecision and inconsistency.

CONCLUSIONS

DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and may be effective in IBD patients, but the evidence is very uncertain.

摘要

背景

联合使用生物制剂和小分子药物可能会克服炎症性肠病(IBD)中药物疗效的瓶颈。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估双重生物治疗(DBT)或小分子药物联合生物治疗(SBT)在IBD患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Clinical trials.gov,检索截至2020年11月3日的文献,纳入了对2例或更多例接受DBT或SBT治疗的IBD患者的研究。主要结局是安全性,以每种联合治疗的不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE)合并发生率进行评估。有效性报告为临床、内镜和/或影像学反应及缓解的合并发生率。证据的确定性根据推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)框架进行评级。

结果

在识别出的3688篇文献中,纳入了13项研究(1项临床试验,12项观察性研究),涉及266例患者,采用7种不同的联合治疗方案。既往使用生物制剂的中位数为0至4,随访的中位数持续时间为16 - 68周。最常见的DBT和SBT分别是维多珠单抗(VDZ)联合抗肿瘤坏死因子(aTNF,n = 56)或托法替布(Tofa,n = 57)。VDZ - aTNF的SAE合并发生率为9.6%(95%置信区间[CI],1.5 - 21.4),Tofa - VDZ的SAE合并发生率为1.0%(95% CI,0.0 - 7.6)。由于研究的观察性性质、非常严重的不精确性和不一致性,证据的总体确定性非常低。

结论

DBT或SBT在IBD患者中似乎总体安全且可能有效,但证据非常不确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e75c/9802439/0c95b3e41544/otac002_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验