Kinoshita Fumiya, Nakayama Meiho, Takada Hiroki
Graduate School of Engineering, Toyama Prefectural University.
Department of Otolaryngology & Good Sleep Center, Nagoya City University.
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2022;77(0). doi: 10.1265/jjh.20010.
The confirmation of abnormal behavior during video monitoring in polysomnography (PSG) and the frequency of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RWA) during REM sleep based on physiological indicators are essential diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). However, no clear criteria have been established for the determination of the tonic and phasic activities of RWA. In this study, we investigated an RWA decision program that simulates visual inspection by clinical laboratory technicians.
We used the measurement data of 25 men and women (average age±standard deviation: 72.7±1.7 years) who visited the Sleep Treatment Center for PSG inspection due to suspected RBD. The chin electromyography (EMG) during REM sleep was divided into 30 s intervals, and RWA decisions were made on the basis of visual inspection by a clinical laboratory technician. We compared and investigated two machine-learning methods namely support vector machine (SVM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) for RWA decisions.
When comparing SVM and CNN, the highest discrimination accuracy for RWA decisions was obtained when using the average rectified value (ARV) processed chin EMG images using CNN as a feature. We also estimated the prevalence of RBD on the basis of the Mahalanobis distance measure using the frequency of occurrence of both tonic and phasic activities calculated from a total of 25 subjects in the patient and healthy groups. Consequently, estimation of RBD prevalence using CNN resulted in misclassification of none of the subjects in the patient group and two subjects in the healthy group.
In this study, we investigated the automatic analysis of PSG results focusing on RBD, which is a parasomnia. As a result, there were no misclassifications of patients in the 25 subjects in the patient or healthy groups based on the estimates of RBD prevalence using CNN. The prevalence estimation based on our proposed automated algorithm is considered effective for the primary screening for RBD.
基于生理指标确认多导睡眠图(PSG)视频监测期间的异常行为以及快速眼动(REM)睡眠期无张力性快速眼动(RWA)的频率是诊断快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD)的重要诊断标准。然而,对于RWA的紧张性和相位性活动的判定尚未建立明确的标准。在本研究中,我们调查了一种模拟临床实验室技术人员目视检查的RWA判定程序。
我们使用了25名因疑似RBD到睡眠治疗中心进行PSG检查的男性和女性(平均年龄±标准差:72.7±1.7岁)的测量数据。将REM睡眠期间的颏肌肌电图(EMG)分为30秒的间隔,并根据临床实验室技术人员的目视检查做出RWA判定。我们比较并研究了两种用于RWA判定的机器学习方法,即支持向量机(SVM)和卷积神经网络(CNN)。
比较SVM和CNN时,使用CNN处理的以平均整流值(ARV)为特征的颏肌EMG图像进行RWA判定时,获得了最高的判别准确率。我们还根据马氏距离测量法,利用从患者组和健康组的总共25名受试者中计算出的紧张性和相位性活动的发生频率,估计了RBD的患病率。因此,使用CNN估计RBD患病率导致患者组中没有受试者被错误分类,健康组中有两名受试者被错误分类。
在本研究中,我们专注于作为异态睡眠的RBD,对PSG结果进行了自动分析。结果,基于使用CNN估计的RBD患病率,患者组或健康组的25名受试者中没有患者被错误分类。基于我们提出的自动化算法的患病率估计被认为对RBD的初步筛查有效。