PURPOSE

To compare the stress distribution through photoelasticity, microhardness and roughness of intact crowns of primary molars (CC) and the preformed crowns of stainless steel (SSC) and zirconia (ZC) used in dental restorations in pediatric dentistry.

METHODS

Six healthy primary molars were selected. For the photoelastic models, the teeth were fixed in photoelastic resin. A load of 100 N was applied, and the models were analyzed by transmission polariscope. The Tardy method was used to quantify the fringe order which calculates the maximum stress (T) value in each selected point. The teeth were prepared for cementation of the crowns. The photoelastic test was repeated for each experimental crown. Knoop microhardness was assessed on the buccal surfaces of the CCs, SSCs, and ZCs using a microhardness tester. Parameters were 50 gf for 5 seconds. Roughness was evaluated using a confocal 3-D laser scanning microscope/software at 216x magnification. Roughness average (Ra) values from each model (expressed in µm) were collected and group means were calculated. The stress distribution, microhardness, and roughness data were compared by using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's test (α= 0.05).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the stress distribution for the CCs, SSCs and ZCs. For the microhardness analysis, the ZCs obtained the highest values compared to the CCs and the SSCs (P< 0.001). The CCs were significantly higher than the SSCs (P= 0.027). There was no difference in roughness for the three models (P= 0.615). The SSCs and ZCs showed satisfactory mechanical behavior.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of preformed crowns, especially those made of esthetic materials, is currently increasing in the field of pediatric dentistry. The knowledge of mechanical properties of stainless steel- and zirconia-prefabricated crowns provides scientific foundation for safe clinical application, especially in primary teeth.