Suppr超能文献

经会阴超声在常规子宫颈测量中的应用。

Transperineal ultrasound in routine uterine cervix measurement.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, 1 rond-point du Pr Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens cedex 1, France.

Clinical Research Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;307(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06521-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is used in routine practice to evaluate cervical length (CL). This technique is nevertheless invasive and often viewed as uncomfortable, which is less the case with transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). This study was conducted in light of recent technological improvements in the ultrasound field to evaluate whether TPUS could be used as an alternative to TVUS in CL assessment.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-blind study. Pregnant women requiring CL measurement during their emergency consultation were offered a second assessment by TPUS after an initial TVUS. TPUS was performed by a third-year OBGYN resident, unaware of the CL measurement obtained via TVUS.

RESULTS

Seventy-three women were included. The mean ∂ was 0.59 mm. The interclass Pearson correlation coefficient between the two techniques was 0.8987 (95% CI [0.8429; 0.9353]). None of the tested factors were found to be associated with a difference between TPUS and TVUS CL measurements. ROC curve analysis indicated that a transperineal CL cut-off measurement of 24.9 mm was predictive of a transvaginal CL measurement below 25 mm. This threshold enabled a 95% sensitivity [75.1-99.9%] and a 100% specificity [93.3-100%] for the TPUS CL measurement technique.

CONCLUSION

TPUS should be acknowledged as a reliable alternative to TVUS for CL assessment in routine every day practice.

摘要

目的

经阴道超声(TVUS)用于评估宫颈长度(CL)是常规做法。然而,这种技术具有侵入性,而且通常被认为不太舒适,而经会阴超声(TPUS)则不然。鉴于超声领域的最新技术进步,本研究旨在评估 TPUS 是否可替代 TVUS 用于 CL 评估。

方法

这是一项前瞻性单盲研究。在急诊咨询中需要测量 CL 的孕妇,在初始 TVUS 后被提供第二次 TPUS 评估。由一名妇产科三年级住院医师进行 TPUS 检查,该医师不知道 TVUS 获得的 CL 测量值。

结果

共有 73 名女性被纳入研究。平均 ∂为 0.59mm。两种技术之间的 Pearson 类内相关系数为 0.8987(95%置信区间[0.8429; 0.9353])。未发现任何测试因素与 TPUS 和 TVUS CL 测量值之间的差异相关。ROC 曲线分析表明,经会阴 CL 截断值为 24.9mm 可预测经阴道 CL 测量值低于 25mm。该阈值使 TPUS CL 测量技术的敏感性达到 95%[75.1-99.9%],特异性达到 100%[93.3-100%]。

结论

TPUS 应被视为评估 CL 的一种可靠的 TVUS 替代方法,可在日常常规实践中使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验