• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展跨专业学习和工作文化,以改善养老院的以人为主的护理:一个现实主义的行动研究方案。

Developing an interprofessional learning and working culture to improve person-centred care in nursing homes: a realist action research protocol.

机构信息

School of Health Studies, Research group Organization of Healthcare and Services, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e058319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058319.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058319
PMID:35321897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8943755/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare is changing due to the ageing of the general population, complex care demands and growing attention to person-centred care. To deal with these changes and provide the best possible person-centred care, the different professionals in nursing homes should all collaborate intensively. However, most professionals work within the field of their own expertise and share very little knowledge, experiences and insights. A lack of an interprofessional learning and working culture also prevents professionals with different expertise from working and learning intensively together to achieve high-quality person-centred care. There is a gap of knowledge about how to develop such a culture. Our aim is to provide insights into what actions, in what context and to what extent can contribute to an impactful development of an interprofessional learning and working culture.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The realist action research design will be applied. It consists of three iterative steps: plan, act and observe, and reflect. First, we will formulate the theory about interprofessional learning and working culture and measure this culture by means of interviews, focus groups and questionnaires. Second, we will apply the nine principles of Practice Development to coach professionals from six Dutch nursing homes to improve their interprofessional learning and working culture. Finally, we will evaluate the impact of the changed attitudes and skills on healthcare practice.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval for the project was given by the Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen (HAN) Research Ethics Committee, the Netherlands, registration number EACO 164.12/19. All organisations, professionals and residents/family members will be informed verbally and by letter about the study and asked for informed consent. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed scientific journals, professional journals and at symposia and conferences. The findings will be transferred to an online toolbox and e-learning modules for graduated professionals and students.

摘要

简介

由于人口老龄化、复杂的护理需求以及对以患者为中心的护理的日益关注,医疗保健正在发生变化。为了应对这些变化并提供尽可能好的以患者为中心的护理,养老院的不同专业人员应该进行深入的合作。然而,大多数专业人员都在自己的专业领域内工作,很少分享知识、经验和见解。缺乏跨专业学习和工作文化也阻止了具有不同专业知识的专业人员紧密合作,共同提供高质量的以患者为中心的护理。对于如何发展这种文化,我们知之甚少。我们的目的是提供深入了解哪些行动、在什么背景下以及在多大程度上可以为跨专业学习和工作文化的发展产生影响。

方法和分析

将应用现实主义行动研究设计。它包括三个迭代步骤:计划、行动和观察以及反思。首先,我们将制定关于跨专业学习和工作文化的理论,并通过访谈、焦点小组和问卷调查来衡量这种文化。其次,我们将应用实践发展的九条原则来指导来自荷兰六家养老院的专业人员,以改善他们的跨专业学习和工作文化。最后,我们将评估改变的态度和技能对医疗保健实践的影响。

伦理和传播

该项目已获得荷兰阿纳姆和奈梅亨应用科学大学(HAN)研究伦理委员会的批准,注册号为 EACO 164.12/19。所有组织、专业人员和居民/家庭成员将通过口头和书面形式了解该研究,并被要求同意。结果将在同行评议的科学期刊、专业期刊以及研讨会和会议上发表。研究结果将被转移到在线工具包和电子学习模块中,供毕业专业人员和学生使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a1/8943755/e19b8d11878a/bmjopen-2021-058319f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a1/8943755/e19b8d11878a/bmjopen-2021-058319f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a1/8943755/e19b8d11878a/bmjopen-2021-058319f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing an interprofessional learning and working culture to improve person-centred care in nursing homes: a realist action research protocol.发展跨专业学习和工作文化,以改善养老院的以人为主的护理:一个现实主义的行动研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 23;12(3):e058319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058319.
2
Which actions contribute to the development of an interprofessional learning and working culture in nursing homes? A realist action study.哪些行动有助于养老院中开展跨专业学习和工作文化?一项现实主义行动研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e085096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085096.
3
Substituting physicians with nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses in nursing homes: protocol for a realist evaluation case study.在养老院用执业护士、医师助理或护士替代医生:一项现实主义评价案例研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 8;7(6):e015134. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015134.
4
How and why educational interventions work to increase knowledge of delirium among healthcare professionals in nursing homes: a protocol for a realist review.如何以及为何教育干预措施能够提高养老院医护人员对谵妄的认知:一项真实主义综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 26;13(7):e072591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072591.
5
Using comprehensive geriatric assessment for quality improvements in healthcare of older people in UK care homes: protocol for realist review within Proactive Healthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH) study.在英国养老院中使用综合老年评估改善老年人医疗保健质量:养老院中老年人主动医疗保健(PEACH)研究中的现实主义综述方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 10;7(10):e017270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017270.
6
Development of an interprofessional person-centred care concept for persons with care needs living in their own homes ( HOME): study protocol for a mixed-methods study.开发面向有居家照护需求的人员的以人为中心的跨专业照护理念(HOME):一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e069597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069597.
7
Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol.旨在实现养老院老年人主动医疗保健的质量改进协作项目(PEACH):一项现实主义评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 12;8(11):e023287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023287.
8
Facilitators for developing an interprofessional learning culture in nursing homes: a scoping review.促进养老院中跨专业学习文化的发展:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09092-5.
9
10
A person-centred and thriving-promoting intervention in nursing homes - study protocol for the U-Age nursing home multi-centre, non-equivalent controlled group before-after trial.养老院中以人为主导并促进活力的干预措施——U-Age养老院多中心、非等效对照组前后对照试验的研究方案
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0404-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Which actions contribute to the development of an interprofessional learning and working culture in nursing homes? A realist action study.哪些行动有助于养老院中开展跨专业学习和工作文化?一项现实主义行动研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):e085096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085096.
2
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of non-emergency surgical patients toward anesthesia.非急诊手术患者对麻醉的知识、态度及实践
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68808-7.
3
Differences in the knowledge, attitudes, and needs of caregivers and healthcare providers regarding palliative care: a cross-sectional investigation in pediatric settings in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Culture in Nursing Homes: An Action Research Study.发展养老院基于证据的护理文化:一项行动研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;19(3):1733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031733.
2
Strategies to facilitate shared decision-making in long-term care.促进长期护理中共同决策的策略。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Sep;15(3):e12314. doi: 10.1111/opn.12314. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
Increasing Complexity of New Nursing Home Residents in Ontario, Canada: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study.加拿大安大略省新入住养老院居民的复杂性日益增加:一项连续横断面研究。
中国儿科环境中照顾者与医疗服务提供者在姑息治疗方面的知识、态度及需求差异:一项横断面调查
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 6;23(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02052-2.
4
Facilitators for developing an interprofessional learning culture in nursing homes: a scoping review.促进养老院中跨专业学习文化的发展:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09092-5.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1293-1300. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16394. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
A culture of caring: the essence of healthcare interprofessional collaboration.关爱文化:医疗保健跨专业合作的精髓。
J Interprof Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):324-331. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1641476. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
Interprofessional Evidence-Based Practice Competencies: Equalizing the Playing Field.跨专业循证实践能力:公平竞争环境
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180282. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0282.
6
Committing to a Culture of Interprofessional Evidence-Based Practice.致力于跨专业循证实践文化。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Oct;14(5):341-342. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12251. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
7
Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly.老年人跨专业协作干预的结果指标
Int J Integr Care. 2016 May 16;16(2):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2017.
8
Interprofessional collaboration in health care: Lessons to be learned from competitive sports.医疗保健中的跨专业协作:从竞技体育中汲取的经验教训。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2015 Jul;148(4):176-9. doi: 10.1177/1715163515588106.
9
Learning to care for older patients: hospitals and nursing homes as learning environments.学习照顾老年患者:医院和养老院作为学习环境。
Med Educ. 2015 Mar;49(3):332-9. doi: 10.1111/medu.12646.
10
Systematic review of interdisciplinary interventions in nursing homes.养老院跨学科干预措施的系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jul;14(7):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Apr 6.