Pediatric bioethics fellow at the University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital.
AMA J Ethics. 2022 Mar 1;24(3):E212-217. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.212.
Critical race theory (CRT) tools of evaluating stock stories and counter stories can help clinicians and researchers illuminate experiences of those at the margins in order to gain insights into the normalized injustices that are hidden from view in a dominant narrative. To do this work requires vigilance and intentionality. Here, CRT is applied to a patient case involving overevaluation for nonaccidental trauma (NAT) to describe the impact on patient care and experience of competing perspectives. CRT is also applied to assess the literature on the harms of inequities in NAT evaluations.
批判种族理论(CRT)的评估股票故事和反故事的工具可以帮助临床医生和研究人员揭示处于边缘地位的人的经历,从而深入了解在主导叙事中被隐藏起来的正常化不公正现象。要做到这一点,需要保持警惕和有意为之。在这里,CRT 被应用于一个涉及非意外伤害(NAT)过度评估的患者病例,以描述竞争观点对患者护理和体验的影响。CRT 也被应用于评估关于 NAT 评估中不平等造成的危害的文献。