• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算荷兰老年人福祉衡量工具(WOOP)的锚定效用关税。

Estimating an anchored utility tariff for the well-being of older people measure (WOOP) for the Netherlands.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114901. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114901. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114901
PMID:35325838
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Health economic evaluations using common health-related quality of life measures may fall short in adequately incorporating all relevant benefits of health and social care interventions targeted at older people. The Well-being of Older People measure (WOOP) is a broader well-being measure that comprises nine well-being domains. The objective of this study was to estimate a utility tariff for the WOOP, to facilitate its application in cost-utility analyses.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration approach was set up and fielded among 2,012 individuals from the Netherlands aged 65 years and above. Matched pairwise choice tasks, colour-coding and level overlap were used to reduce the cognitive burden of the DCE. The choice tasks were created using a Bayesian heterogeneous D-efficient design. The estimation procedure accommodated for nonlinear time preferences via an exponential discounting function.

RESULTS

The estimation results showed that 'physical health', 'mental health', and 'making ends meet' were the most important well-being domains for older people, followed by 'independence' and 'living situation'. Of somewhat lesser importance were domains like 'social life', 'receiving support' and 'feeling useful'. The generated utility tariffs can be used to translate well-being states described with the WOOP to a utility score between -0.616 and 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established a tariff for the WOOP, which will facilitate its use in economic evaluations of health and social care interventions targeted at older people, first of all in the Netherlands.

摘要

目的

使用常见的与健康相关的生活质量衡量标准进行健康经济评估,可能无法充分纳入针对老年人的卫生和社会保健干预措施的所有相关收益。福祉老年人衡量标准(WOOP)是一个更广泛的福祉衡量标准,包括九个福祉领域。本研究的目的是为 WOOP 制定效用关税,以促进其在成本效用分析中的应用。

方法

建立了一个具有持续方法的离散选择实验(DCE),并在荷兰年龄在 65 岁及以上的 2012 名个体中进行了调查。使用匹配的成对选择任务、颜色编码和水平重叠来减轻 DCE 的认知负担。使用贝叶斯异质 D 有效设计创建选择任务。估计过程通过指数贴现函数来适应非线性时间偏好。

结果

估计结果表明,“身体健康”、“心理健康”和“收支平衡”是老年人最重要的福祉领域,其次是“独立”和“生活状况”。稍微次要的领域包括“社交生活”、“获得支持”和“感觉有用”。生成的效用关税可用于将 WOOP 描述的福祉状态转换为 -0.616 至 1 之间的效用得分。

结论

本研究为 WOOP 制定了一个关税,这将促进其在针对老年人的卫生和社会保健干预措施的经济评估中的使用,首先是在荷兰。

相似文献

1
Estimating an anchored utility tariff for the well-being of older people measure (WOOP) for the Netherlands.估算荷兰老年人福祉衡量工具(WOOP)的锚定效用关税。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114901. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114901. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
Well-being of Older People (WOOP): Quantitative validation of a new outcome measure for use in economic evaluations.老年人健康(WOOP):一种新的经济评估结果测量工具的定量验证。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:113109. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113109. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
3
Content validation of the Well-being of Older People measure (WOOP).老年人幸福感量表(WOOP)的内容验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Aug 21;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01834-5.
4
Estimating a Preference-Based Value Set for the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL).估算心理健康生活质量问卷(MHQoL)基于偏好的价值集。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):64-75. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231208645. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
5
Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China.验证老年人幸福度工具(WOOP)在中国的适用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010277.
6
A discrete choice experiment to obtain a tariff for valuing informal care situations measured with the CarerQol instrument.一项离散选择实验,旨在获得用于评估以照顾者生活质量(CarerQol)工具衡量的非正式照护情况的费用标准。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):84-96. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13492013. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Development of Population Tariffs for the CarerQol Instrument for Hungary, Poland and Slovenia: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study to Measure the Burden of Informal Caregiving.开发匈牙利、波兰和斯洛文尼亚的 CarerQol 工具的人口关税:一项衡量非正规护理负担的离散选择实验研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jun;38(6):633-643. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00899-2.
8
Measuring Care-Related Quality of Life of Caregivers for Use in Economic Evaluations: CarerQol Tariffs for Australia, Germany, Sweden, UK, and US.用于经济评估的护理人员护理相关生活质量测量:澳大利亚、德国、瑞典、英国和美国的护理者生活质量量表
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):469-478. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0477-x.
9
On the Optimization of Bayesian D-Efficient Discrete Choice Experiment Designs for the Estimation of QALY Tariffs That Are Corrected for Nonlinear Time Preferences.用于估计经非线性时间偏好校正后的 QALY 关税的贝叶斯 D-有效离散选择实验设计的优化。
Value Health. 2019 Oct;22(10):1162-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Advocating a Paradigm Shift in Health-State Valuations: The Estimation of Time-Preference Corrected QALY Tariffs.倡导健康状态估值范式转变:时间偏好校正 QALY 关税的估计。
Value Health. 2018 Aug;21(8):993-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Immediate Death: Not So Bad If You Discount the Future but Still Worse than It Should Be.猝死:如果你不考虑未来,倒也不算太糟,但仍比应有的情况更糟糕。
Med Decis Making. 2025 May;45(4):376-384. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251325828. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Appropriateness of the EQ-HWB for Use in Residential Aged Care: A Proxy Perspective.
适用于养老院的 EQ-HWB 问卷:代理视角。
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):673-683. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00715-5. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Utilizing regression model to characterize the impact of urban green space features on the subjective well-being of older adults.利用回归模型来描述城市绿地特征对老年人主观幸福感的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 2;10(15):e35567. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35567. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
5
Face Validity of Four Preference-Weighted Quality-of-Life Measures in Residential Aged Care: A Think-Aloud Study.四种偏好加权生活质量测量方法在养老机构中的表面有效性:出声思维研究。
Patient. 2023 Nov;16(6):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00647-6. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
A head-to-head comparison of well-being of older people (WOOP) and EQ-5D-5L in patients, carers and general public in China.中国患者、照顾者和普通公众中老年人(WOOP)和 EQ-5D-5L 幸福感的头对头比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33248-2.
7
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.离散选择实验在健康状态估值中的应用:进展与新趋势的系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Validating the Well-Being of Older People (WOOP) Instrument in China.验证老年人幸福度工具(WOOP)在中国的适用性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010277.