• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于诊断巨细胞动脉炎的具有出色诊断准确性的简化PET/CT测量程序。

A Simplified PET/CT Measurement Routine with Excellent Diagnostic Accuracy for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis.

作者信息

Imfeld Stephan, Scherrer Delia, Mensch Noemi, Aschwanden Markus, Staub Daniel, Berger Christoph T, Daikeler Thomas, Rottenburger Christof

机构信息

Department of Angiology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;12(3):728. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030728.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12030728
PMID:35328281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8946981/
Abstract

We previously proposed standard uptake value (SUV) ratio-based cut-off values for [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for diagnosing giant cell arteritis (GCA) with high diagnostic accuracy. Here we confirm our findings in an independent cohort and report a simplified procedure for using a SUV ratio to diagnose LV-GCA. Patients with suspected GCA were consecutively included. The ‘peak SUV ratio’ was defined in a two-step approach. First, the vessel with the visually brightest radiotracer uptake in the supra-aortic (SA) and in the aorto-iliofemoral (AIF) region was identified. Here, the maximum SUV of the vessel was measured and divided by the mean SUV of the liver (SUVratio). A ratio >1.0 in the SA or >1.3 in the AIF region was scored as vasculitis. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ‘peak SUV ratio’ in the SA and AIF region was assessed. From 2015 to 2019, 50 patients (24 female, median age 71 years) with suspicion of GCA were included, 28 patients with GCA and 22 patients with exclusion of GCA. Peak SUV had an AUC of 0.91, a sensitivity of 0.89, and a specificity of 0.73 for diagnosing GCA. Peak SUV accuracy of the AIF arteries was lower (AUC 0.81) than of the SA arteries (AUC 0.95). Our SUV ratio cut-off values for diagnosing GCA are consistently valid, also when applied in a time-efficient clinical procedure focusing on the peak SUV ratio. The diagnostic performance of PET/CT in this validation cohort was even higher, compared to the inception cohort (AUC of 0.83).

摘要

我们之前提出了基于标准摄取值(SUV)比值的[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)的截断值,用于诊断巨细胞动脉炎(GCA),具有较高的诊断准确性。在此,我们在一个独立队列中证实了我们的发现,并报告了一种使用SUV比值诊断局限性GCA的简化程序。连续纳入疑似GCA的患者。“峰值SUV比值”通过两步法定义。首先,确定在主动脉弓上(SA)和主动脉-髂股(AIF)区域放射性示踪剂摄取视觉上最亮的血管。在此,测量该血管的最大SUV,并除以肝脏的平均SUV(SUV比值)。SA区域比值>1.0或AIF区域比值>1.3被判定为血管炎。评估了SA和AIF区域“峰值SUV比值”的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性。2015年至2019年,纳入50例疑似GCA的患者(24例女性,中位年龄71岁),其中28例为GCA患者,22例排除GCA患者。峰值SUV诊断GCA的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.91,敏感性为0.89,特异性为0.73。AIF动脉的峰值SUV准确性(AUC 0.81)低于SA动脉(AUC 0.95)。我们用于诊断GCA的SUV比值截断值始终有效,即使应用于聚焦峰值SUV比值的高效临床程序中也是如此。与初始队列(AUC为0.83)相比,该验证队列中PET/CT的诊断性能更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b20/8946981/a8e0dc80d1e4/diagnostics-12-00728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b20/8946981/d6d0ed268d6a/diagnostics-12-00728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b20/8946981/a8e0dc80d1e4/diagnostics-12-00728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b20/8946981/d6d0ed268d6a/diagnostics-12-00728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b20/8946981/a8e0dc80d1e4/diagnostics-12-00728-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Simplified PET/CT Measurement Routine with Excellent Diagnostic Accuracy for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis.一种用于诊断巨细胞动脉炎的具有出色诊断准确性的简化PET/CT测量程序。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;12(3):728. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030728.
2
[18F]FDG positron emission tomography in patients presenting with suspicion of giant cell arteritis-lessons from a vasculitis clinic.[18F]FDG 正电子发射断层扫描在怀疑巨细胞动脉炎患者中的应用——来自血管炎门诊的经验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):933-940. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex259.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting large-vessel giant cell arteritis using FDG PET/CT as the reference.超声检查对大血管巨细胞动脉炎的诊断准确性:以 FDG PET/CT 作为参考标准。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;59(8):2062-2073. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez568.
4
Three days of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment attenuates large-vessel 18F-FDG uptake in large-vessel giant cell arteritis but with a limited impact on diagnostic accuracy.大剂量糖皮质激素治疗 3 天可减轻大动脉型巨细胞动脉炎患者 18F-FDG 摄取,但对诊断准确性的影响有限。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jul;45(7):1119-1128. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4021-4. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
5
Semi-Quantitative [F]FDG-PET/CT ROC-Analysis-Based Cut-Offs for Aortitis Definition in Giant Cell Arteritis.基于半定量[F]FDG-PET/CT ROC 分析的巨细胞动脉炎主动脉炎定义的截断值。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 8;23(24):15528. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415528.
6
Diagnostic performance of F-FDG PET-CT for large vessel involvement assessment in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis and negative temporal artery biopsy.18F-FDG PET-CT 对疑诊巨细胞动脉炎且颞动脉活检阴性患者大血管受累评估的诊断性能。
Ann Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;33(7):512-520. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01358-5. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Specific features to differentiate Giant cell arteritis aortitis from aortic atheroma using FDG-PET/CT.应用 FDG-PET/CT 鉴别巨细胞动脉炎主动脉炎与主动脉粥样硬化的特征。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 30;11(1):17389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96923-2.
8
Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization.巨细胞动脉炎中 FDG PET/CT 的不同评分方法:标准化的必要性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(37):e1542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001542.
9
Simple dichotomous assessment of cranial artery inflammation by conventional 18F-FDG PET/CT shows high accuracy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a case-control study.常规 18F-FDG PET/CT 对颅动脉炎症的简单二分法评估对巨细胞动脉炎的诊断具有很高的准确性:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jan;46(1):184-193. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4106-0. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Visual and semiquantitative assessment of cranial artery inflammation with FDG-PET/CT in giant cell arteritis.巨细胞动脉炎患者应用 FDG-PET/CT 进行颅动脉炎症的视觉和半定量评估。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Aug;50(4):616-623. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings Corresponding to Vasculitis as Defined via [F]FDG Positron Emission Tomography or Ultrasound.与通过[F]FDG正电子发射断层扫描或超声定义的血管炎相对应的磁共振成像结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;13(23):3559. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233559.
2
New thresholds in semi-quantitative [F]FDG PET/CT are needed to assess large vessel vasculitis with long-axial field-of-view scanners.需要新的半定量 [F]FDG PET/CT 阈值来评估使用长轴向视野扫描仪的大血管血管炎。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Nov;50(13):3890-3896. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06423-w. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Imaging in diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations.

本文引用的文献

1
Semi-Quantitative and Quantitative [F]FDG-PET/CT Indices for Diagnosing Large Vessel Vasculitis: A Critical Review.用于诊断大血管血管炎的半定量和定量[F]FDG-PET/CT指标:一项批判性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2355. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122355.
2
The clinical benefit of imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis.影像学在巨细胞动脉炎诊断和治疗中的临床益处。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Aug 22;148:w14661. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14661. eCollection 2018 Aug 13.
3
EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice.
大血管血管炎的诊断、监测和预后评估中的影像学:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析,为 2023 年 EULAR 建议更新提供信息。
RMD Open. 2023 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003379.
EULAR 临床实践中应用影像学检查大血管血管炎的推荐建议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):636-643. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
[18F]FDG positron emission tomography in patients presenting with suspicion of giant cell arteritis-lessons from a vasculitis clinic.[18F]FDG 正电子发射断层扫描在怀疑巨细胞动脉炎患者中的应用——来自血管炎门诊的经验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):933-940. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex259.
5
Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis.托珠单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):317-328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.
6
Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization.巨细胞动脉炎中 FDG PET/CT 的不同评分方法:标准化的必要性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(37):e1542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001542.
7
Giant cell arteritis: a systematic review of the qualitative and semiquantitative methods to assess vasculitis with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.巨细胞动脉炎:18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描评估血管炎的定性和半定量方法的系统评价
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:574248. doi: 10.1155/2014/574248. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
8
Vascular involvement in patients with giant cell arteritis determined by duplex sonography of 2x11 arterial regions.采用 2x11 动脉区域的双功能超声检测巨细胞动脉炎患者的血管受累情况。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jul;69(7):1356-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.122135. Epub 2010 May 24.
9
Assessment of large-vessel involvement in giant cell arteritis with 18F-FDG PET: introducing an ROC-analysis-based cutoff ratio.18F-FDG PET评估巨细胞动脉炎中大血管受累情况:引入基于ROC分析的截断比值
J Nucl Med. 2008 Jul;49(7):1107-13. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.051920. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
10
The value of [18F]FDG-PET in the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis and the assessment of activity and extent of disease.[18F]氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描([18F]FDG-PET)在大血管血管炎诊断以及疾病活动度和范围评估中的价值。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Jun;32(6):674-81. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1757-9. Epub 2005 Mar 4.