Gratale Stefanie K, Teotia Arjun, Chen-Sankey Julia, Ganz Ollie, Delnevo Cristine D, Strasser Andrew A, Wackowski Olivia A
Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3221. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063221.
Although cigars pose health risks similar to cigarettes, their packaging/marketing is not subject to commensurate regulation in the US. In a 2000 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission, seven major manufacturers agreed to use some form of cigar warning. In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration passed a rule requiring larger standardized warnings, but the requirement was successfully challenged in court. Here, we examined U.S. population-level trends in noticing existing cigarillo, traditional and filtered cigar warnings. We analyzed Wave 5 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health adult data to assess prevalence of past-30 day warning noticing and associations with socio-demographic and tobacco use variables. Noticing was higher among current users of cigarillos (27%), filtered (34%) and traditional cigars (21%), than non-users (8% for each product, p < 0.0001), and among every-day vs. some-day users, established vs. experimental users, and past-30 day users vs. those without past-30 day use. Results varied by product, but generally indicated lower noticing among non-Hispanic Whites and dual cigarette users, but higher noticing among those purchasing cigars by the box/pack (vs. not purchasing for themselves). Low overall noticing but higher prevalence among frequent users underscores a need for a stronger, uniform cigar warning label policy in the US.
尽管雪茄带来的健康风险与香烟类似,但在美国,其包装/营销并未受到相应的监管。在2000年与联邦贸易委员会达成的一项协议中,七家主要制造商同意采用某种形式的雪茄警示。2016年,美国食品药品监督管理局通过了一项规定,要求采用更大的标准化警示,但该要求在法庭上被成功质疑。在此,我们研究了美国人群中注意到现有小雪茄、传统雪茄和过滤嘴雪茄警示的趋势。我们分析了烟草与健康人口评估第5波的成人数据,以评估过去30天注意到警示的流行情况以及与社会人口统计学和烟草使用变量的关联。当前使用小雪茄(27%)、过滤嘴雪茄(34%)和传统雪茄(21%)的人群中注意到警示的比例高于非使用者(每种产品均为8%,p<0.0001),在每日使用者与非每日使用者、长期使用者与尝试使用者以及过去30天使用者与过去30天未使用者之间也是如此。结果因产品而异,但总体而言,非西班牙裔白人以及同时使用香烟的人群中注意到警示的比例较低,而整盒/整包购买雪茄的人群(与不为自己购买的人群相比)中注意到警示的比例较高。总体注意到警示的比例较低,但频繁使用者中的患病率较高,这凸显了美国需要制定更强有力、统一的雪茄警示标签政策。