Moore Anna, Stapley Emily, Hayes Daniel, Town Rosa, Deighton Jessica
Evidence Based Practice Unit (EBPU), University College London, London N1 9JH, UK.
Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families (AFNCCF), London N1 9JH, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063587.
Despite an increasing focus on schools to deliver support and education around mental health and wellbeing, interventions are often not sustained beyond initial funding and research. In this review, the barriers and facilitators to sustaining mental health and wellbeing interventions in schools are explored. A systematic review was conducted using keywords based on the terms: 'sustainability', 'school', 'intervention', 'mental health', and 'emotional wellbeing'. Six online databases (PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE, British Education Index, ERIC, and Web of Science) and relevant websites were searched resulting in 6160 unique references. After screening, 10 articles were included in the review and extracted data were qualitatively synthesized using thematic analysis. Data synthesis led to the identification of four sustainability factors at the school level (school leadership, staff engagement, intervention characteristics, and resources) and one at the wider system level (external support). These factors were separated into 15 themes and discussed as barriers and facilitators to sustainability (for example, school culture and staff turnover). Most articles included no definition of sustainability, and nearly all barriers and facilitators were discussed at the school level. The findings suggest that more longitudinal and theory-driven research is required to develop a clearer picture of the sustainability process.
尽管学校越来越注重提供围绕心理健康和幸福的支持与教育,但干预措施往往在初始资金和研究结束后就无法持续下去。在本综述中,探讨了在学校维持心理健康和幸福干预措施的障碍和促进因素。使用基于 “可持续性”“学校”“干预”“心理健康” 和 “情绪健康” 等术语的关键词进行了系统综述。搜索了六个在线数据库(PsycINFO、Embase、MEDLINE、英国教育索引、教育资源信息中心和科学引文索引)以及相关网站,共得到6160条独特的参考文献。经过筛选,10篇文章被纳入综述,并使用主题分析法对提取的数据进行了定性综合。数据综合得出了学校层面的四个可持续性因素(学校领导、员工参与度、干预措施特征和资源)以及更广泛系统层面的一个因素(外部支持)。这些因素被细分为15个主题,并作为可持续性的障碍和促进因素进行了讨论(例如,学校文化和员工流动率)。大多数文章没有对可持续性进行定义,几乎所有的障碍和促进因素都是在学校层面进行讨论的。研究结果表明,需要更多的纵向研究和理论驱动的研究,以便更清楚地了解可持续性过程。