Bhatta Hari Datta, Davidi Roy, Yeredor Arie, Tur Moshe
School of Electrical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;22(6):2403. doi: 10.3390/s22062403.
Fiber-optic dynamic interrogators, which use periodic frequency scanning, actually sample a time-varying measurand on a time grid. Commonly, however, the sampled values are reported on a time grid, synchronized with the periodic scanning. It is the novel and noteworthy message of this paper that this artificial assignment may give rise to significant distortions in the recovered signal. These distortions increase with both the signal frequency and measurand dynamic range for a given sampling rate and frequency scanning span of the interrogator. They may reach disturbing values in dynamic interrogators, which trade-off scanning speed with scanning span. The paper also calls for manufacturers of such interrogators to report the sampled values along with their instants of acquisition, allowing interpolation algorithms to substantially reduce the distortion. Experimental verification of a simulative analysis includes: (i) a commercial dynamic interrogator of 'continuous' FBG fibers that attributes the measurand values to a uniform time grid; as well as (ii) a dynamic Brillouin Optical time Domain (BOTDA) laboratory setup, which provides the sampled measurand values together with the sampling instants. Here, using the available measurand-dependent sampling instants, we demonstrate a significantly cleaner signal recovery using spline interpolation.
采用周期性频率扫描的光纤动态解调器实际上是在时间网格上对随时间变化的被测量进行采样。然而,通常采样值是在与周期性扫描同步的时间网格上报告的。本文新颖且值得注意的观点是,这种人为赋值可能会在恢复的信号中产生显著失真。对于给定的采样率和解调器的频率扫描范围,这些失真会随着信号频率和被测量动态范围的增加而增大。在动态解调器中,它们可能会达到令人不安的值,因为动态解调器需要在扫描速度和扫描范围之间进行权衡。本文还呼吁此类解调器的制造商报告采样值及其采集时刻,以便插值算法能够大幅降低失真。模拟分析的实验验证包括:(i)一种“连续”FBG光纤的商用动态解调器,它将被测量值归因于统一的时间网格;以及(ii)一个动态布里渊光时域(BOTDA)实验室装置,它提供采样的被测量值以及采样时刻。在此,利用可用的与被测量相关的采样时刻,我们展示了使用样条插值能显著更清晰地恢复信号。