Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV-Clinic, Aalst, Belgium; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV-Clinic, Aalst, Belgium; Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Sep-Oct;16(5):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
To investigate the learning curve and the minimum number of cases required for a cardiologist in training to acquire the skills to an accurate pre-TAVI cardiac CT (CCT) analysis using a semi-automatic software.
In this prospective, observational study, 40 CCTs of patients scheduled for TAVI were independently evaluated twice by 5 readers (80 readings each, 400 in total): a certified TAVI-CT specialist served as the reference reader (RR) and 4 cardiology fellows (2 interventional and 2 non-invasive cardiac imaging) as readers. The primary outcome was the minimum number of cases required to achieve an accuracy in imaging interpretation ≥80%, defined as the agreement between each reader and the RR in both balloon and self-expandable valve size choice. The secondary outcomes were the intra- and inter-observer variability.
After 50 readings (25 cases repeated twice) cardiology fellows were able to select the appropriate valve size with ≥ 80% of accuracy compared to the RR, independently of valve calcification, image quality and slice thickness. Learning curves of both interventional and non-invasive cardiac imaging fellows showed a similar trend. Cardiology fellows achieved a very high intra- and inter-observer reliability for both perimeter and area assessment, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.96 to 0.99.
Despite the individual differences, cardiology fellows required 50 readings (25 cases repeated twice) to get adequately skilled in the pre-TAVI CCT interpretation. These results provide valuable information for developing adequate training sessions and education protocols for both companies and cardiologists involved.
为了研究培训中的心脏病专家使用半自动软件获得准确的 TAVI 前心脏 CT(CCT)分析技能所需的学习曲线和最小案例数。
在这项前瞻性观察研究中,40 名计划接受 TAVI 的患者的 CCT 由 5 名读者(每位读者评估 80 次,共 400 次)独立评估两次:一名经过认证的 TAVI-CT 专家作为参考读者(RR)和 4 名心脏病学研究员(2 名介入心脏病学研究员和 2 名非侵入性心脏成像研究员)作为读者。主要结果是获得≥80%成像解释准确性所需的最小案例数,定义为每位读者与 RR 在球囊和自膨式瓣膜大小选择方面的一致性。次要结果是观察者内和观察者间的可变性。
在 50 次读数(25 次重复两次)后,心脏病学研究员能够与 RR 相比,以≥80%的准确性选择合适的瓣膜大小,独立于瓣膜钙化、图像质量和切片厚度。介入心脏病学和非侵入性心脏成像研究员的学习曲线显示出相似的趋势。心脏病学研究员在评估周长和面积时具有非常高的观察者内和观察者间可靠性,组内相关系数(ICC)范围为 0.96 至 0.99。
尽管存在个体差异,但心脏病学研究员需要 50 次读数(25 次重复两次)才能熟练掌握 TAVI 前 CCT 解释。这些结果为制定充分的培训课程和教育协议提供了有价值的信息,这些课程和协议适用于涉及的公司和心脏病专家。