• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桥接移植治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的功能能力和生活质量的长期保持:来自日本全国多中心登记处的报告。

Long-term preservation of functional capacity and quality of life in advanced heart failure patients with bridge to transplant therapy: A report from Japanese nationwide multicenter registry.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;356:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.03.044. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.03.044
PMID:35337935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Under the revised heart allocation system in the United States, bridge to transplant (BTT) patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have a longer waitlist period, as they are now lowly prioritized. However, little is known regarding the long-term trajectory of functional capacity (FC) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) among BTT-LVAD patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 442 consecutive patients with BTT-LVAD between April 2013 and May 2019 from a Japanese nationwide registry. FC (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class, peak oxygen uptake [VO], and 6-min walk test [6MWT]) and HR-QOL (European Quality of Life [EQ-5D index] and Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-VAS]) were assessed at baseline and for up to 60 months after LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period of 30 months (IQR 18-42 months), 100 (22.6%) patients underwent transplantation, 37 (8.3%) died, and 14 (3.1%) underwent explantation for recovery. Mean peak VO, 6MWT distance, EQ-5D index, and EQ-VAS significantly improved 3 months after LVAD implantation (p = 0.0012, p = 0.0037, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, these improvements were sustained for up to 60 months following LVAD implantation. Major adverse events including device failure, infection, stroke, and bleeding, which occurred within the first 3 months after LVAD implantation may have not affected FC or HR-QOL for up to 60 months (p = 0.15, p = 0.22, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BTT patients showed long-term preservation of FC and HR-QOL, suggesting that BTT remains an option despite the long waiting time to HTx.

摘要

背景

在美国修订的心脏分配系统下,桥接移植(BTT)患者使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的等待时间更长,因为他们的优先级较低。然而,对于 BTT-LVAD 患者的功能能力(FC)和健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)的长期轨迹知之甚少。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 4 月至 2019 年 5 月期间来自日本全国登记处的 442 例连续 BTT-LVAD 患者。在 LVAD 植入后,评估 FC(纽约心脏协会[NYHA]功能分级、峰值摄氧量[VO]和 6 分钟步行试验[6MWT])和 HR-QOL(欧洲生活质量[EQ-5D 指数]和视觉模拟量表[EQ-VAS]),最长可达 60 个月。

结果

在 30 个月(IQR 18-42 个月)的随访期间,100 例(22.6%)患者接受了移植,37 例(8.3%)死亡,14 例(3.1%)因恢复而进行了除颤。LVAD 植入后 3 个月,峰值 VO、6MWT 距离、EQ-5D 指数和 EQ-VAS 均显著改善(p=0.0012、p=0.0037、p<0.001、p<0.001,分别)。此外,这些改善在 LVAD 植入后长达 60 个月内持续存在。LVAD 植入后 3 个月内发生的主要不良事件,包括设备故障、感染、中风和出血,可能不会对 FC 或 HR-QOL 产生影响,长达 60 个月(p=0.15、p=0.22,分别)。

结论

BTT 患者的 FC 和 HR-QOL 长期保持,这表明尽管 HTx 等待时间较长,但 BTT 仍然是一种选择。

相似文献

1
Long-term preservation of functional capacity and quality of life in advanced heart failure patients with bridge to transplant therapy: A report from Japanese nationwide multicenter registry.桥接移植治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的功能能力和生活质量的长期保持:来自日本全国多中心登记处的报告。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;356:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.03.044. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
3
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation.终末期心力衰竭患者使用左心室辅助装置的临床疗效及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(45):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9450.
4
Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.左心室辅助装置:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(3):1-69. Epub 2004 Mar 1.
5
Association of Clinical Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device Use by Bridge to Transplant or Destination Therapy Intent: The Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Randomized Clinical Trial.临床结局与通过桥接移植或目的地治疗意向使用左心室辅助装置的关联:使用 HeartMate 3(MOMENTUM 3)机械循环支持治疗的多中心磁悬浮技术研究(MOMENTUM 3)随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):411-419. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5323.
6
Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.左心室辅助装置植入后疾病特异性与通用健康状况测量的变化:来自 INTERMACS 的见解。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Nov;36(11):1243-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 20.
7
Changing Strategy Between Bridge to Transplant and Destination LVAD Therapy After the First 3 Months: Analysis of the STS-INTERMACS Database.桥接心脏移植和目的地左心室辅助装置治疗后 3 个月的策略变化:STS-INTERMACS 数据库分析。
J Card Fail. 2024 Apr;30(4):552-561. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
8
Quality of life and functional capacity outcomes in the MOMENTUM 3 trial at 6 months: A call for new metrics for left ventricular assist device patients.质量和功能容量的结果在时刻 3 试验 6 个月:呼吁新的指标为左心室辅助装置患者。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Jan;37(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of second- and third-generation left ventricular assist devices as either bridge to transplant or alternative to transplant for adults eligible for heart transplantation: systematic review and cost-effectiveness model.第二代和第三代左心室辅助装置作为适合心脏移植的成人移植桥接或替代治疗的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价和成本效益模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Nov;17(53):1-499, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17530.
10
Changes in Use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation With New Heart Allocation Policy.新心脏分配政策下左心室辅助装置作为移植桥梁使用情况的变化
JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;9(6):420-429. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart transplantation with super-aged donors older than 65 years.使用65岁以上超高龄供体进行心脏移植。
JHLT Open. 2024 Mar 15;4:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100083. eCollection 2024 May.
2
The experience of bodily image for patients with left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置患者的身体意象体验。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 23;15:1484428. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1484428. eCollection 2024.
3
Exercise training in left ventricular assist device patients: Protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis.
左心室辅助装置患者的运动训练:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析的方案
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):649-656. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15063. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
4
Impact of Different Therapeutic Strategies With Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Health-Related Quality of Life During Prolonged Device-Based Support.左心室辅助装置不同治疗策略对长期基于装置支持期间健康相关生活质量的影响。
Circ Rep. 2023 Jun 9;5(7):289-297. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0126. eCollection 2023 Jul 10.