Kroese Tiuri E, van Laarhoven Hanneke W M, Nilsson Magnus, Lordick Florian, Guckenberger Matthias, Ruurda Jelle P, D'Ugo Domenico, Haustermans Karin, van Cutsem Eric, van Hillegersberg Richard, van Rossum Peter S N
Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2022 May;166:254-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
Local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer may improve overall survival (OS). The primary aim was to identify definitions of esophagogastric OMD. A secondary aim was to perform a meta-analysis of OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone for OMD.
Studies and study protocols reporting on definitions or OS after local treatment for esophagogastric OMD were included. The primary outcome was the maximum number of organs/lesions considered OMD and the maximum number of lesions per organ (i.e. 'organ-specific' OMD burden). Agreement was considered to be either absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥ 75%). The secondary outcome was the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone. The ROBINS tool was used for quality assessment.
A total of 97 studies, including 7 study protocols, and 2 prospective studies, were included. OMD was considered in 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases (consensus). 'Organ-specific' OMD burden could involve bilobar ≤ 3 liver metastases, unilateral ≤ 2 lung metastases, 1 extra-regional lymph node station, ≤ 2 brain metastases, or bilateral adrenal gland metastases (consensus). Local treatment for OMD was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone based on 6 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74) and for liver oligometastases based on 5 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59). All studies scored serious risk of bias.
Current literature considers esophagogastric cancer spread limited to 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station to be OMD. Local treatment for OMD appeared associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.
食管癌和胃癌患者的寡转移疾病(OMD)采用局部治疗(转移灶切除术或立体定向放射治疗)可能会提高总生存期(OS)。主要目的是确定食管胃癌OMD的定义。次要目的是对OMD局部治疗与单纯全身治疗后的总生存期进行荟萃分析。
纳入报告食管胃癌OMD局部治疗后定义或总生存期的研究及研究方案。主要结局是被视为OMD的器官/病灶的最大数量以及每个器官的最大病灶数量(即“器官特异性”OMD负担)。一致性被认为是无/差(<50%)、一般(50%-75%)或共识(≥75%)。次要结局是局部治疗与单纯全身治疗后总生存期的合并调整风险比(aHR)。使用ROBINS工具进行质量评估。
共纳入97项研究,包括7项研究方案和2项前瞻性研究。OMD被认为是1个器官有≤3处转移(达成共识)。“器官特异性”OMD负担可能包括双侧叶≤3处肝转移、单侧≤2处肺转移、1个区域外淋巴结站、≤2处脑转移或双侧肾上腺转移(达成共识)。基于6项非随机研究(合并aHR 0.47,95%CI:0.30-0.74)以及基于5项非随机研究的肝寡转移(合并aHR 0.39,95%CI:0.22-0.59),OMD的局部治疗与单纯全身治疗相比可提高总生存期。所有研究的偏倚风险均为高。
当前文献认为食管癌和胃癌转移局限于1个器官且有≤3处转移或1个区域外淋巴结站为OMD。与单纯全身治疗相比,OMD的局部治疗似乎可提高总生存期。有必要开展前瞻性随机试验。