Suppr超能文献

利益相关者参与一项比较有效性/实施研究,以预防感染复发:CA-MRSA 项目(CAMP2)。

Stakeholder Engagement In a Comparative Effectiveness/Implementation Study to Prevent Infection Recurrence: CA-MRSA Project (CAMP2).

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(1):45-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant or methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections pose serious clinical and public health challenges. Few protocols exist for outpatient education, decolonization and decontamination.

OBJECTIVES

This trial implemented infection prevention protocols in homes via community health workers/Promotoras.

METHODS

We engaged clinicians, patient stakeholders, clinical and laboratory researchers, New York-based federally qualified health centers and community hospital emergency departments. The Clinician and Patient Stakeholder Advisory Committee (CPSAC) convened in person and remotely for shared decision-making and trial oversight.

RESULTS

The intervention trial consented participants with skin and soft tissue infections from Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, completed home visits, obtained surveillance cultures from index patients and household members and sampled household environmental surfaces at baseline and three months.

LESSONS LEARNED

The retention of the CPSAC during the trial demonstrated high levels of engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

CPSAC was highly effective throughout design and execution by troubleshooting recruitment and home visit challenges.

摘要

背景

耐甲氧西林或甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染对临床和公共卫生构成严重挑战。针对门诊教育、去定植和去污的方案很少。

目的

本试验通过社区卫生工作者/宣传员在家庭中实施感染预防方案。

方法

我们邀请了临床医生、患者利益相关者、临床和实验室研究人员、位于纽约的联邦合格的健康中心和社区医院急诊科参与。临床医生和患者利益相关者咨询委员会(CPSAC)通过面对面和远程方式进行了会议,共同做出决策并监督试验。

结果

干预试验同意了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌或甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌皮肤和软组织感染患者参加,完成了家访,从指数患者和家庭成员身上获得了监测培养物,并在基线和三个月时对家庭环境表面进行了采样。

经验教训

在试验期间,CPSAC 的保留证明了其高水平的参与度。

结论

CPSAC 在设计和执行过程中通过解决招募和家访挑战方面非常有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Using attendance data for social network analysis of a community-engaged research partnership.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 21;5(1):e75. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.571.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness Study of Home-Based Interventions to Prevent CA-MRSA Infection Recurrence.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 13;10(9):1105. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091105.
2
Using attendance data for social network analysis of a community-engaged research partnership.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 21;5(1):e75. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.571.
4
Impact of Decolonization Protocols and Recurrence in Pediatric MRSA Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections.
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.040. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Community-Based Participatory Research.
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):e48-e50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024241.
7
Supporting New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 25;16(1):44. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010044.
9
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验