Tiwari Shilpi, Kulkarni Parimala, Agrawal Nikita, Mali Shikha, Kale Saurabh, Jaiswal Nandani
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Peoples College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Nandani Jaiswal, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Peoples College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, Phone: +91 9604986494, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Nov 1;22(11):1338-1345.
To assess various dental anxiety scales used in children and to know the effectiveness of different projective dental anxiety scales used in pediatric dentistry.
Dental anxiety poses a significant problem in child patient management and is considered to be the main barrier for successful completion of the dental treatment.
This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered at the International prospective register of systematic reviews-PROSPERO-CRD42021247586. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases [PubMed (MEDLINE), COCHRANE Library, EMBASE, EBSCO host, and Google Scholar database] were searched for corresponding references up to 2021. Observational cross-sectional studies comparing two different dental anxiety scales were selected for this systematic review. Search strategy generated 500 articles out of which 13 studies included in qualitative synthesis and only 7 studies were taken for quantitative synthesis. Among these seven studies, five studies compared FIS and VPT scales, two studies compared RMS, FIS, and VPT scales. Results of meta-analysis showed that an overall mean difference of dental anxiety between VPT and FIS scales was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.26-0.48), RMS and FIS scales was 0.05 (95% CI: 0.40-0.50), RMS and VPT was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.80-0.27) in the investigated population.
No statistically significant difference was noted in all comparisons suggesting that all these scales are at par in assessing anxiety levels in pediatric population.
The projective scales Raghavendra, madhuriu, sujata pictorial scale (RMS), Facial image scale (FIS), and Venham's picture test (VPT) can be a pragmatic tool in assessing children's dental anxiety.
评估用于儿童的各种牙科焦虑量表,并了解不同投射性牙科焦虑量表在儿童牙科中的有效性。
牙科焦虑在儿童患者管理中是一个重大问题,被认为是成功完成牙科治疗的主要障碍。
本系统评价和荟萃分析已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库-PROSPERO-CRD42021247586中注册。系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。检索了电子数据库[PubMed(MEDLINE)、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、EBSCO主机和谷歌学术数据库],以获取截至2021年的相应参考文献。本系统评价选择了比较两种不同牙科焦虑量表的观察性横断面研究。检索策略共产生500篇文章,其中13项研究纳入定性综合分析,仅7项研究进行定量综合分析。在这7项研究中,5项研究比较了FIS和VPT量表,2项研究比较了RMS、FIS和VPT量表。荟萃分析结果显示,在研究人群中,VPT和FIS量表之间牙科焦虑的总体平均差异为0.11(95%CI:0.26-0.48),RMS和FIS量表之间为0.05(95%CI:0.40-0.50),RMS和VPT之间为0.27(95%CI:0.80-0.27)。
所有比较均未发现统计学上的显著差异,这表明所有这些量表在评估儿童人群的焦虑水平方面相当。
投射性量表拉格文德拉量表、马杜里乌量表、苏贾塔图片量表(RMS)、面部图像量表(FIS)和韦纳姆图片测试(VPT)可作为评估儿童牙科焦虑的实用工具。