Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab, 140306, India.
Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, University Campus, Jaisigpura, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, 431004, India.
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01992-0.
Divergence in the evolutionary interests of males and females leads to sexual conflict. Traditionally, sexual conflict has been classified into two types: inter-locus sexual conflict (IeSC) and intra-locus sexual conflict (IaSC). IeSC is modeled as a conflict over outcomes of intersexual reproductive interactions mediated by loci that are sex-limited in their effects. IaSC is thought to be a product of selection acting in opposite directions in males and females on traits with a common underlying genetic basis. While in their canonical formalisms IaSC and IeSC are mutually exclusive, there is growing support for the idea that the two may interact. Empirical evidence for such interactions, however, is limited.
Here, we investigated the interaction between IeSC and IaSC in Drosophila melanogaster. Using hemiclonal analysis, we sampled 39 hemigenomes from a laboratory-adapted population of D. melanogaster. We measured the contribution of each hemigenome to adult male and female fitness at three different intensities of IeSC, obtained by varying the operational sex ratio. Subsequently, we estimated the intensity of IaSC at each sex ratio by calculating the intersexual genetic correlation (r) for fitness and the proportion of sexually antagonistic fitness-variation. We found that the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness was positive at all three sex ratios. Additionally, at male biased and equal sex ratios the r was higher, and the proportion of sexually antagonistic fitness variation lower, relative to the female biased sex ratio, although this trend was not statistically significant.
Our results indicate a statistically non-significant trend suggesting that increasing the strength of IeSC ameliorates IaSC in the population.
男性和女性进化利益的分歧导致了性冲突。传统上,性冲突分为两种类型:基因座间性冲突(IeSC)和基因座内性冲突(IaSC)。IeSC 被建模为通过在效应上受性别限制的基因座介导的雌雄间生殖相互作用的结果的冲突。IaSC 被认为是在具有共同遗传基础的特征上,雌雄双方选择方向相反的产物。虽然在它们的规范形式中,IaSC 和 IeSC 是相互排斥的,但越来越多的证据支持这两种冲突可能相互作用的观点。然而,这种相互作用的经验证据是有限的。
在这里,我们研究了果蝇中的 IeSC 和 IaSC 之间的相互作用。使用半克隆分析,我们从一个经过实验室适应的果蝇种群中采样了 39 个半基因组。我们在三个不同的 IeSC 强度下测量了每个半基因组对成年雄性和雌性适应性的贡献,通过改变操作性别比例来获得。随后,我们通过计算适应性的雌雄间遗传相关性(r)和具有性拮抗适应性变异的比例来估计每个性别比例的 IaSC 强度。我们发现,在所有三个性别比例下,适应性的雌雄间遗传相关性都是正的。此外,在雄性偏向和性别比例相等时,r 更高,具有性拮抗适应性变异的比例更低,相对于雌性偏向的性别比例,尽管这种趋势在统计学上并不显著。
我们的结果表明,存在一种统计学上非显著的趋势,表明增加 IeSC 的强度可以改善种群中的 IaSC。