Department of Woman's and Child's Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, University of Padua, Via Nicolò Giustiniani, 3, 35128, Padua, Padova, Italy.
Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04545-x.
Our aim was to assess diagnostic accuracy in the prediction of small for gestational age (SGA <10th centile) and fetal growth restricted (FGR) (SGA <3rd centile) fetuses using three different sonographic methods in pregnancies at increased risk of fetal growth restriction: 1) fetal abdominal circumference (AC) z-scores, 2) estimated fetal weight (EFW) z-scores according to postnatal reference standard; 3) EFW z-scores according to a prenatal reference standard.
Singleton pregnancies at increased risk of fetal growth restriction seen in two university hospitals between 2014 and 2015 were studied retrospectively. EFW was calculated using formulas proposed by the INTERGROWTH-21st project and Hadlock; data derived from publications by the INTEGROWTH-twenty-first century project and Hadlock were used to calculate z-scores (AC and EFW). The accuracy of different methods was calculated and compared.
The study group included 406 patients. Prenatal standard EFW z-scores derived from INTERGROWTH-21st project and Hadlock and co-workers performed similarly and were more accurate in identifying SGA infants than using AC z-scores or a postnatal reference standard. The subgroups analysis demonstrated that EFW prenatal standard was more or similarly accurate compared to other methods across all subgroups, defined by gestational age and birth weight.
Prenatal standard EFW z-scores derived from either INTERGROWTH-21 st project or Hadlock and co-workers publications demonstrated a statistically significant advantage over other biometric methods in the diagnosis of SGA fetuses.
我们旨在评估在高危胎儿生长受限(SGA <10 百分位)和胎儿生长受限(FGR)(SGA <3 百分位)的妊娠中,使用三种不同超声方法预测胎儿生长受限的诊断准确性:1)胎儿腹围(AC)Z 评分,2)根据产后参考标准的估计胎儿体重(EFW)Z 评分;3)根据产前参考标准的 EFW Z 评分。
回顾性研究 2014 年至 2015 年在两所大学医院就诊的高危胎儿生长受限的单胎妊娠。EFW 是使用 INTERGROWTH-21 项目和 Hadlock 提出的公式计算的;来自 INTERGROWTH-twenty-first 世纪项目和 Hadlock 的出版物的数据用于计算 Z 评分(AC 和 EFW)。计算并比较了不同方法的准确性。
研究组包括 406 例患者。来自 INTERGROWTH-21 项目和 Hadlock 的产前标准 EFW Z 评分与 Hadlock 等的研究结果相似,在识别 SGA 婴儿方面比使用 AC Z 评分或产后参考标准更准确。亚组分析表明,产前标准 EFW 与其他方法相比,在所有亚组中,无论是在妊娠年龄还是出生体重方面,都具有更高或相似的准确性。
来自 INTERGROWTH-21 项目或 Hadlock 等出版物的产前标准 EFW Z 评分在诊断 SGA 胎儿方面明显优于其他生物测量方法。