Chang Wen-Pei, Chen Hsiao-Mei, Wu Jia-Rong, Tsai Hsiu-Ting, Ho Chiung-Fang, Lin Yu-Huei
Department of Nursing, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Mar;32(5-6):726-735. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16307. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the adverse effects of non-intubated suctioning.
Airway hygiene aims to maintain a patent airway to ensure adequate ventilation. Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal or nasotracheal suctioning may be used in patients who require airway suctioning but do not have an artificial airway. However, no studies till date provide insight into the adverse effects of non-intubated airway suctioning.
A clinical data-based retrospective design.
Using institutional and clinical databases of three university hospitals in 2008-2016, we conducted a study with a propensity score matching method of 3,326 hospitalised patients who had undergone suction therapy with or without a tracheotomy. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the link between suctioning and the probabilities of adverse effects. STROBE checklist was used to report the current study.
Patients who required nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal or nasotracheal suctioning had a higher risk of gastrointestinal ulcers than tracheotomised patients (adjusted OR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.24-3.20). Patients who received non-intubated suction had a higher risk of developing pneumonia (adjusted OR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.26-2.00), and the risk of aspiration pneumonia was three times higher than tracheotomised patients (adjusted OR 3.04; 95% CI, 1.40-6.60).
Non-intubated patients who require suctioning for airway clearing are more susceptible to gastrointestinal ulcers, pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia. The findings would facilitate in alerting healthcare professionals to this group of patients. However, more clinical research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of adverse effects in non-intubated patients who require suctioning.
The adverse effects of suctioning can easily be overlooked in debilitated patients with no intubation. Professionals must be aware of the discomfort and risks that patients may experience.
本研究旨在调查非插管吸痰的不良影响。
气道清洁旨在维持气道通畅以确保充足通气。对于需要气道吸痰但无人工气道的患者,可采用鼻咽、口咽或鼻气管吸痰。然而,迄今为止尚无研究深入探讨非插管气道吸痰的不良影响。
基于临床数据的回顾性设计。
利用2008 - 2016年三家大学医院的机构和临床数据库,我们采用倾向评分匹配法对3326例接受或未接受气管切开吸痰治疗的住院患者进行了研究。进行条件逻辑回归分析以调查吸痰与不良影响发生概率之间的关联。采用STROBE清单报告本研究。
需要鼻咽、口咽或鼻气管吸痰的患者发生胃溃疡的风险高于气管切开患者(调整后比值比1.99;95%可信区间,1.24 - 3.20)。接受非插管吸痰的患者发生肺炎的风险更高(调整后比值比1.59;95%可信区间,1.26 - 2.00),且吸入性肺炎的风险比气管切开患者高3倍(调整后比值比3.04;95%可信区间,1.40 - 6.60)。
需要通过吸痰清理气道的非插管患者更容易发生胃溃疡、肺炎和吸入性肺炎。这些发现将有助于提醒医护人员关注这类患者。然而,需要更多临床研究来阐明需要吸痰的非插管患者发生不良影响的机制。
在无插管的虚弱患者中,吸痰的不良影响很容易被忽视。专业人员必须意识到患者可能经历的不适和风险。