• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三尖瓣峡部依赖型房扑窦律转复后永久性心脏起搏器植入的预测因素。

Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after sinus conversion of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 29;12(1):5336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09439-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09439-8
PMID:35351981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8964688/
Abstract

It is unclear which factors are associated with progressive sinus node dysfunction after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. We sought to evaluate the incidence and predictors for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after CTI-dependent AFL ablation. Between January 2011 and June 2021, 353 patients underwent CTI-dependent AFL ablation were studied. During a median follow-up of 31.6 months, 30 patients (8.5%) received PPM implantation, 24 for sick sinus syndrome and 6 for atrioventricular block. In multivariable model, prior atrial fibrillation (AF) (HR 3.570; 95% CI 1.034-12.325; P = 0.044), lowest previous sinus heart rate (HR 0.942; 95% CI 0.898-0.988; P = 0.015), and left atrial volume index (LAVI) (HR 1.067; 95% CI 1.024-1.112; P = 0.002) were independently associated with PPM implantation after CTI-dependent AFL ablation. The best cut-off points for predicting PPM implantation were 60.1 ml/m for LAVI and 46 beats per minute for lowest previous sinus heart rate. Among the patients discharged without PPM implantation after ablation, sinus pause over three seconds at AFL termination during ablation was an independent predictor of PPM implantation (HR 17.841; 95% CI 4.626-68.807; P < 0.001). Physicians should be aware of the possibility of PPM implantation during follow-up after AFL ablation, especially in patients with the relevant risk factors.

摘要

目前尚不清楚哪些因素与三尖瓣峡部依赖型房扑(AFL)消融后窦房结功能障碍的进展有关。我们旨在评估三尖瓣峡部依赖型 AFL 消融后永久性心脏起搏器(PPM)植入的发生率和预测因素。2011 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,研究了 353 例行三尖瓣峡部依赖型 AFL 消融的患者。在中位随访 31.6 个月期间,30 例患者(8.5%)植入 PPM,24 例因病态窦房结综合征,6 例因房室传导阻滞。多变量模型中,先前的心房颤动(AF)(HR 3.570;95%CI 1.034-12.325;P=0.044)、最低的窦性心率(HR 0.942;95%CI 0.898-0.988;P=0.015)和左心房容积指数(LAVI)(HR 1.067;95%CI 1.024-1.112;P=0.002)与三尖瓣峡部依赖型 AFL 消融后 PPM 植入独立相关。预测 PPM 植入的最佳截断点为 LAVI 为 60.1ml/m 和最低窦性心率为 46 次/分。在消融后未植入 PPM 出院的患者中,AFL 终止时窦性停搏超过 3 秒是 PPM 植入的独立预测因素(HR 17.841;95%CI 4.626-68.807;P<0.001)。医生应在 AFL 消融后随访期间注意 PPM 植入的可能性,尤其是在有相关危险因素的患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/5937ed8c990c/41598_2022_9439_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/d22edb8d7789/41598_2022_9439_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/e822ef9e29f5/41598_2022_9439_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/5937ed8c990c/41598_2022_9439_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/d22edb8d7789/41598_2022_9439_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/e822ef9e29f5/41598_2022_9439_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c55b/8964688/5937ed8c990c/41598_2022_9439_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after sinus conversion of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.三尖瓣峡部依赖型房扑窦律转复后永久性心脏起搏器植入的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 29;12(1):5336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09439-8.
2
Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter.三尖瓣峡部消融治疗房扑后新发心房颤动的发生率。
Europace. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1776-1780. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw343.
3
Atrial fibrillation inducibility during cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation as a predictor of clinical atrial fibrillation. A meta-analysis.三尖瓣峡部依赖性房扑消融术中房颤诱发情况作为临床房颤预测指标的荟萃分析
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;48(3):307-315. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0211-9. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
4
Atypical electrocardiographic features of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter occurring during left atrial fibrillation ablation.左心房颤动消融期间发生的腔静脉三尖瓣峡部依赖性心房扑动的非典型心电图特征
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010 Jul;15(3):200-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00364.x.
5
Predictors of acute inefficacy and the radiofrequency energy time required for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.急性无效的预测因素以及三尖瓣峡部依赖性房扑消融所需的射频能量时间。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Jun;49(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0232-z. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Predictors of atrial fibrillation after ablation of typical atrial flutter.典型心房扑动消融后心房颤动的预测因素。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Nov;93(5):484-9. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001100008.
7
Predictors and Incidence of Atrial Flutter After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.预测心房颤动导管消融术后房扑的发生及发生率。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;124(11):1690-1696. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.026. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
Recurrent atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: a very long-term follow-up of 333 patients.三尖瓣峡部导管消融术后复发性心房扑动和心房颤动:333例患者的长期随访
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;7(3):225-31. doi: 10.1023/a:1021392105994.
9
Cavotricuspid isthmus line in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without history of typical atrial flutter: A meta-analysis.有或无典型心房扑动病史的心房颤动患者行导管消融时的腔静脉三尖瓣峡部线:一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1987-1995. doi: 10.1111/jce.14614. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Significance of fragmented QRS complexes for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.碎裂 QRS 波群对预测依赖于房间隔峡部的房性心动过速消融后新发心房颤动的意义。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1493-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Sinus node dysfunction after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: A case report.射频导管消融治疗房性心动过速后窦房结功能障碍:1 例报告。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023 Mar;28(2):e13010. doi: 10.1111/anec.13010. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Elevated Left Atrial Volume Index Predicts Incident Atrial Fibrillation After Typical Right Atrial Flutter Ablation.左心房容积指数升高可预测典型右心房扑动消融术后新发心房颤动
J Atr Fibrillation. 2021 Jun 30;14(1):20200485. doi: 10.4022/jafib.20200485. eCollection 2021 Jun-Jul.
2
Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Post-cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Typical Atrial Flutter Without History of Atrial Fibrillation.无房颤病史的典型心房扑动患者经腔静脉三尖瓣峡部消融术后新发房颤的风险
Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 30;12:763478. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.763478. eCollection 2021.
3
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
4
Risk of sick sinus syndrome in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort.诊断为心房颤动的患者中病态窦房结综合征的风险:基于人群的队列研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Oct;32(10):2704-2714. doi: 10.1111/jce.15202. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
5
Sex differences in Cardiac electronic device implantation: Outcomes from an Australian multi-centre clinical quality registry.心脏电子设备植入中的性别差异:来自澳大利亚多中心临床质量登记处的结果。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jun 23;35:100828. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100828. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Pathophysiological background and prognosis of common atrial flutter in non-elderly patients: Comparison to Atrial Fibrillation.非老年患者常见房扑的病理生理学背景和预后:与心房颤动的比较。
J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;78(5):362-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
7
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC.2020年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动诊断和管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动诊断和管理特别工作组,由ESC欧洲心律协会(EHRA)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
8
Permanent Pacemaker Implantations after Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Associated with Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction.房颤合并潜在窦房结功能障碍患者导管消融术后永久性起搏器植入术
Korean Circ J. 2020 Apr;50(4):346-357. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0268. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
9
Disease progression after ablation for atrial flutter compared with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study.与心房颤动相比,心房扑动消融术后的疾病进展:一项全国性队列研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;72(11):e13258. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13258. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmia: a consensus document of the European Heart Rhythm Association, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society.心律失常中的性别差异:欧洲心律协会共识文件,得到心律学会和亚太心律学会认可。
Europace. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):1565-1565ao. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy067.