Left main bifurcation treatment: is one stent enough?
作者信息
den Dekker W K, Mahmoud K D, Boersma E
机构信息
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Room Rg628, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Eur Heart J. 2022 Jun 1;43(21):2078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac078.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Left main bifurcation treatment: is one stent enough?
Eur Heart J. 2022 Jun 1;43(21):2078. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac078.
2
Analysis of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions treated with biolimus-eluting DEVAX AXXESS plus nitinol self-expanding stent: intravascular ultrasound results of the AXXENT trial.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):34-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21765.
3
Two-Year Outcomes and Predictors of Target Lesion Revascularization for Non-Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Following Two-Stent Strategy With 2nd-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.
Circ J. 2018 Feb 23;82(3):798-806. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1092. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 17;65(6):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031.
5
6
Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):550-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.016.
7
COmplex coronary Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a strategy using a dedicated self-expanding biolimus-eluting stent versus a culotte strategy using everolimus-eluting stents: primary results of the COBRA trial.
EuroIntervention. 2016 Apr 20;11(13):1457-67. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M05_02.
8
Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 1;89(2):E53-E63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26527. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
Temporal changes in characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes of coronary bifurcation lesion interventions.
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Jan;30(1):33-43. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000672.
10
Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
本文引用的文献
1
The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 1;42(37):3829-3839. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283.
2
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
3
The European Bifurcation Club Left Main Study (EBC MAIN): rationale and design of an international, multicentre, randomised comparison of two stent strategies for the treatment of left main coronary bifurcation disease.
EuroIntervention. 2016 May 17;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I1A8.
4
Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 9;61(14):1482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.023. Epub 2013 Mar 10.
Zotero 插件