• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广泛局部切除与莫氏显微外科手术后隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤复发情况:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Recurrence After Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Martin Emma C St, Vyas Krishna S, Batbold Sarah, Erwin Patricia J, Brewer Jerry D

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Minnesota campus, Rochester, Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2022 May 1;48(5):479-485. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003411. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003411
PMID:35353755
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence (LR) rates of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) treated with different surgical modalities are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the differences in LR rates of DFSP treated with wide local excision (WLE) versus Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pertinent studies of DFSP treated with either WLE or MMS were identified through a search of multiple databases, including Ovid MEDLINE (1946-2018), Embase (1988-2018), Web of Science (1975-2018), and Scopus (1970-2018). Comparative 2-arm and noncomparative single-arm studies were assessed through meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 517 studies identified, 88 met inclusion criteria (12 comparative studies; 76 single-arm studies). In the 12 comparative studies, 352 patients with DFSP underwent MMS and 777 patients with DFSP underwent WLE. The LR rate was 1.7% after MMS and 3.7% after WLE (odds ratio, 1.549; 95% CI, 0.710-3.381; p = .27). In the 76 noncomparative studies, 980 patients underwent MMS (LR rate, 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.9%-2.1%; p < .001), and 2,215 patients underwent WLE (LR rate, 9.4%; 95% CI, 7.5%-11.3%; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The LR rate of DFSP in patients treated with MMS is lower than in patients treated with WLE. Because of high rates of postoperative DFSP LR, MMS should be strongly considered when available.

摘要

背景

采用不同手术方式治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP)的局部复发(LR)率尚不清楚。

目的

评估广泛局部切除(WLE)与莫氏显微外科手术(MMS)治疗DFSP的LR率差异。

材料与方法

通过检索多个数据库,包括Ovid MEDLINE(1946 - 2018年)、Embase(1988 - 2018年)、科学引文索引(1975 - 2018年)和Scopus(1970 - 2018年),确定有关WLE或MMS治疗DFSP的相关研究。通过荟萃分析评估比较性双臂研究和非比较性单臂研究。

结果

在检索到的517项研究中,88项符合纳入标准(12项比较性研究;76项单臂研究)。在12项比较性研究中,352例DFSP患者接受了MMS,777例DFSP患者接受了WLE。MMS后的LR率为1.7%,WLE后为3.7%(优势比,1.549;95%置信区间,0.710 - 3.381;p = 0.27)。在76项非比较性研究中,980例患者接受了MMS(LR率,1.5%;95%置信区间,0.9% - 2.1%;p < 0.001),2215例患者接受了WLE(LR率,9.4%;95%置信区间,7.5% - 11.3%;p < 0.001)。

结论

接受MMS治疗的DFSP患者的LR率低于接受WLE治疗的患者。由于DFSP术后LR率较高,如有条件应强烈考虑采用MMS。

相似文献

1
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Recurrence After Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.广泛局部切除与莫氏显微外科手术后隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤复发情况:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Dermatol Surg. 2022 May 1;48(5):479-485. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003411. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery over the traditional wide local excision surgery in the cure of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.莫氏显微外科手术相较于传统广泛局部切除手术治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的疗效。
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Aug 13;33:297. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.297.17692. eCollection 2019.
3
Wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, and reconstructive options for treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast: A retrospective case series from Mayo Clinic.广泛局部切除、Mohs 显微描记手术和重建选择治疗乳房隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:来自 Mayo 诊所的回顾性病例系列。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 6;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03022-9.
4
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:广泛局部切除与莫氏显微外科手术对比
Cancer Treat Rev. 2008 Dec;34(8):728-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
5
Mohs micrographic surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): a single-centre series of 76 patients treated by frozen-section Mohs micrographic surgery with a review of the literature.Mohs 显微外科手术治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP):单中心 76 例冷冻切片 Mohs 显微外科手术治疗的系列研究及文献复习。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Oct;67(10):1315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 May 23.
6
A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.莫氏显微外科手术与广泛手术切除治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Jul;35(1):82-7.
7
Comparing Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision in the management of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a scoping review.比较莫氏显微外科手术和广泛局部切除在头颈部隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤治疗中的应用:一项范围综述
J Dermatolog Treat. 2024 Dec;35(1):2295816. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2295816. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
8
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a report on 29 patients treated by Mohs micrographic surgery with long-term follow-up and review of the literature.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:29例采用莫氏显微外科手术治疗患者的报告及长期随访与文献复习
Cancer. 2004 Jul 1;101(1):28-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20316.
9
A Comparison of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Wide Local Excision for Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans With Long-Term Follow-up: The Mayo Clinic Experience.莫氏显微外科手术与广泛局部切除治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的长期随访比较:梅奥诊所经验
Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):98-106. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000910.
10
A 10-year review of surgical management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.一项关于隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的手术治疗的 10 年回顾。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Apr;184(4):731-739. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19346. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming Mohs Limitations in Treating DFSP: Retrospective Analysis of a Novel Excision Technique.克服莫氏手术在治疗隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤中的局限性:一种新型切除技术的回顾性分析
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;15(7):1025. doi: 10.3390/life15071025.
2
A perturbing case of a recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant cell fibroblastoma hybrid.一例复发性隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤与巨细胞成纤维细胞瘤混合型的棘手病例。
JAAD Case Rep. 2025 Apr 21;60:174-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2025.04.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Improved Survival in Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.
莫氏显微外科手术与皮肤癌生存率的提高:一项叙述性综述。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jun;15(6):1283-1306. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01410-5. Epub 2025 Apr 20.
4
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: The Impact of the Surgical Incision Site in Relation to Tumor Recurrence.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:手术切口部位与肿瘤复发的关系
Cureus. 2024 Dec 12;16(12):e75591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75591. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
A retrospective review of Mohs micrographic surgery trends over more than 10 years in Saudi Arabia.回顾性分析 10 多年来在沙特阿拉伯进行的 Mohs 显微外科手术趋势。
Saudi Med J. 2023 Jul;44(7):667-673. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.7.20220892.
6
Wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, and reconstructive options for treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast: A retrospective case series from Mayo Clinic.广泛局部切除、Mohs 显微描记手术和重建选择治疗乳房隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤:来自 Mayo 诊所的回顾性病例系列。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 6;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03022-9.
7
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans challenges: a case series and review of the literature.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的挑战:病例系列和文献复习。
J Med Case Rep. 2023 Jan 19;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03728-6.