Suppr超能文献

下颈椎转移瘤的术后结果:前路、后路及联合入路的比较。

Postoperative outcomes of subaxial cervical spine metastasis: Comparison among the anterior, posterior, and combined approaches.

作者信息

Luksanapruksa Panya, Santipas Borriwat, Rajinda Panupol, Chueaboonchai Theera, Chituaarikul Korpphong, Bovonratwet Patawut, Wilartratsami Sirichai

机构信息

Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunpasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.

出版信息

J Bone Oncol. 2022 Mar 19;34:100424. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100424. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of subaxial spinal metastases increases due to longer life expectancy resulting from successful modern cancer treatments. The three most utilized approaches for surgical treatment include the anterior, posterior, and combined approaches. However, despite increasing surgical volume, data on the postoperative complication profiles of different operative approaches for this patient population is scarce.

METHODS

The institutional databases of two large referral centers in Thailand were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with subaxial cervical spine metastasis who underwent cervical surgery during 2005 to 2015 were identified and enrolled. Clinical presentations, baseline characteristics, operative approach, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes, including pain, neurological recovery, and survival, were compared among the three surgical approaches.

RESULTS

The 70 patients (44 with anterior approach, 14 with posterior approach, 12 with combined approach) were enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Tomita score, and Revised Tokuhashi score, among the three groups. There were no significant differences among groups for medical complications, surgical complications, neurological recovery, verbal pain score improvement, survival time, or ambulatory status improvement. However, the combined approach did show a significantly higher rate of overall perioperative complications ( = 0.01), intraoperative blood loss ( < 0.001), and operative time ( < 0.001) compared to the other two approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the combined approach group had the highest rates of perioperative complications. However, although the differences were not statistically significant, patients in the combined group tended to have better clinical outcomes after follow-up and the longest survival time.

摘要

背景

由于现代癌症治疗的成功使预期寿命延长,下颈椎脊柱转移瘤的发病率有所增加。三种最常用的手术治疗方法包括前路、后路和联合入路。然而,尽管手术量在增加,但关于该患者群体不同手术入路术后并发症情况的数据却很匮乏。

方法

对泰国两个大型转诊中心的机构数据库进行回顾性研究。确定并纳入2005年至2015年期间接受颈椎手术的下颈椎转移瘤患者。比较三种手术入路的临床表现、基线特征、手术入路、围手术期并发症及术后结果,包括疼痛、神经功能恢复和生存率。

结果

共纳入70例患者(前路手术44例,后路手术14例,联合入路手术12例)。三组患者术前特征,包括查尔森合并症指数(CCI)、富田评分和修订的Tokuhashi评分,差异均无统计学意义。三组在医疗并发症、手术并发症、神经功能恢复、言语疼痛评分改善、生存时间或活动状态改善方面差异均无统计学意义。然而,与其他两种入路相比,联合入路的围手术期总体并发症发生率(P = 0.01)、术中失血量(P < 0.001)和手术时间(P < 0.001)明显更高。

结论

联合入路组患者围手术期并发症发生率最高。然而,尽管差异无统计学意义,但联合入路组患者随访后的临床结果往往更好,生存时间最长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c064/8960946/90c77306ae5d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验