Biology Department, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jul;32(5):e2592. doi: 10.1002/eap.2592. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Dominant species often have disproportionately high abundance in restored communities compared to native remnants, which potentially could reduce the conservation value of restorations. Research is needed to determine how the abundance of dominant species in restoration plantings affects community assembly, species diversity, and ecosystem function. Most studies of dominant species in grasslands were modeled after experiments on keystone species, using the short-term experimental removal of dominants to test their functional role in ecosystems. However, the removal of established dominants constitutes a major disturbance that may influence the interpretation of their long-term functional impact. To address this, we experimentally assembled high-diversity tallgrass prairie communities that included or excluded the predicted dominant species (Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans) from the seed mix at the time of planting, but without further manipulation of community composition. From 2013 to 2019, we measured several ecosystem functions and community dynamics in the presence or absence of dominants. Communities that included the dominant species had lower species richness, greater aboveground biomass, and reduced light availability at the soil surface. Dominant species presence also increased soil nutrient availability and rates of litter decomposition, although dominant grass litter decomposed more slowly than litter from other common species in both treatments. In the absence of the dominant grasses, communities were instead dominated by a common unplanted forb, Solidago altissima, and there was partial compensation in ecosystem functioning in these forb-dominated communities. The effects of dominant species exclusion may only be apparent in long-term studies of experimentally assembled communities that avoid the legacy effects associated with removal experiments. Furthermore, our results suggest that prairie restorations that limit or exclude the dominant grasses in seed mixes may achieve higher species diversity, increasing the conservation value of these systems.
优势物种在恢复群落中的丰度往往比本地残余物高得不成比例,这可能降低恢复的保护价值。需要研究确定恢复种植中优势物种的丰度如何影响群落组装、物种多样性和生态系统功能。大多数关于草原优势物种的研究都是在对关键物种进行实验的基础上进行的,通过短期的优势物种去除实验来测试它们在生态系统中的功能作用。然而,已建立的优势物种的去除构成了一种主要干扰,可能会影响对其长期功能影响的解释。为了解决这个问题,我们通过实验组装了高多样性的草原群落,在种植时从种子混合物中包含或排除预测的优势物种(Andropogon gerardii 和 Sorghastrum nutans),但不进一步操纵群落组成。从 2013 年到 2019 年,我们在有或没有优势物种的情况下测量了几个生态系统功能和群落动态。包含优势物种的群落具有较低的物种丰富度、较高的地上生物量和减少的土壤表面光照。优势物种的存在也增加了土壤养分的可利用性和凋落物分解的速率,尽管在两种处理中,优势草类凋落物的分解速度都比其他常见物种的凋落物慢。在没有优势草类的情况下,群落则由一种常见的未种植的野草,Solidago altissima 占据优势,并且在这些以野草为主的群落中,生态系统功能存在部分补偿。只有在避免与去除实验相关的遗留效应的情况下,对通过实验组装的群落进行长期研究,才能明显看出优势物种排除的影响。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在种子混合物中限制或排除优势草类的草原恢复可能会实现更高的物种多样性,从而提高这些系统的保护价值。