ISPA - Instituto Universitário, William James Center for Research, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041, Lisbon, Portugal.
Association for Pschology Science, Washington, USA.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Apr 1;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00379-5.
Previous research has mostly approached face recognition and target identification by focusing on face perception mechanisms, but memory mechanisms also appear to play a role. Here, we examined how the presence of a mask interferes with the memory mechanisms involved in face recognition, focusing on the dynamic interplay between encoding and recognition processes. We approach two known memory effects: (a) matching study and test conditions effects (i.e., by presenting masked and/or unmasked faces) and (b) testing expectation effects (i.e., knowing in advance that a mask could be put on or taken off). Across three experiments using a yes/no recognition paradigm, the presence of a mask was orthogonally manipulated at the study and the test phases. All data showed no evidence of matching effects. In Experiment 1, the presence of masks either at study or test impaired the correct identification of a target. But in Experiments 2 and 3, in which the presence of masks at study or test was manipulated within participants, only masks presented at test-only impaired face identification. In these conditions, test expectations led participants to use similar encoding strategies to process masked and unmasked faces. Across all studies, participants were more liberal (i.e., used a more lenient criterion) when identifying masked faces presented at the test. We discuss these results and propose that to better understand how people may identify a face wearing a mask, researchers should take into account that memory is an active process of discrimination, in which expectations regarding test conditions may induce an encoding strategy that enables overcoming perceptual deficits.
先前的研究大多通过关注面部感知机制来研究人脸识别和目标识别,但记忆机制似乎也起着作用。在这里,我们研究了面具的存在如何干扰人脸识别所涉及的记忆机制,重点关注编码和识别过程之间的动态相互作用。我们研究了两种已知的记忆效应:(a)匹配研究和测试条件效应(即通过呈现掩蔽和/或未掩蔽的面孔)和(b)测试期望效应(即预先知道面具可以戴上或取下)。在使用 yes/no 识别范式的三个实验中,面具在学习和测试阶段都被正交地操纵。所有数据都没有证据表明存在匹配效应。在实验 1 中,面具的存在无论是在学习阶段还是在测试阶段都会干扰目标的正确识别。但在实验 2 和 3 中,在参与者内部操纵了面具在学习或测试阶段的存在,只有在测试阶段仅呈现面具会损害对面部的识别。在这些条件下,测试期望促使参与者使用类似的编码策略来处理掩蔽和未掩蔽的面孔。在所有研究中,参与者在识别测试中呈现的掩蔽面孔时更加宽松(即使用更宽松的标准)。我们讨论了这些结果,并提出为了更好地理解人们如何识别戴面具的面孔,研究人员应该考虑到记忆是一个主动的辨别过程,其中关于测试条件的期望可能会诱导一种编码策略,从而克服感知缺陷。