Sanofi Pasteur, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sanofi Pasteur, Singapore.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;22(6):901-911. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00706-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
Dengue is endemic in many countries throughout the tropics and subtropics, and the disease causes substantial morbidity and health-care burdens in these regions. We previously compared antibody responses after one-dose, two-dose, or three-dose primary regimens with the only approved dengue vaccine CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia; Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France) in individuals aged 9 years and older with previous dengue exposure. In this study, we assessed the need for a CYD-TDV booster after these primary vaccination regimens.
In this randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study, healthy individuals aged 9-50 years recruited from three sites in Colombia and three sites in the Philippines (excluding those with the usual contraindications to vaccinations) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 via a permuted block method with stratification by site and by age group using an independent voice response system to receive, at 6-month intervals, three doses of CYD-TDV (three-dose group), one dose of placebo followed by two doses of CYD-TDV (two-dose group), or two doses of placebo followed by one dose of CYD-TDV (one-dose group). Participants were also randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a CYD-TDV booster at 1 year or 2 years after the last primary dose. Each CYD-TDV dose was 0·5 mL and administered subcutaneously in the deltoid region of the upper arm. The investigators and sponsor, study staff interacting with the investigators, and participants and their parents or legally acceptable representatives were masked to group assignment. Neutralising antibodies were measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation testing, and geometric mean titres (GMTs) were calculated. Due to a change in study protocol, only participants who were dengue seropositive at baseline in the Colombian cohort received a booster vaccination. The primary outcome was to show non-inferiority of the booster dose administered at 1 year or 2 years after the two-dose and three-dose primary regimens; non-inferiority was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided adjusted 95% CI of the between-group (day 28 post-booster dose GMT from the three-dose or two-dose group vs day 28 GMT post-dose three of the three-dose primary regimen [three-dose group]) geometric mean ratio (GMR) was higher than 0·5 for each serotype. Non-inferiority of the 1-year or 2-year booster was shown if all four serotypes achieved non-inferiority. Safety was assessed among all participants who received the booster. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02628444, and is closed to accrual.
Between May 2 and Sept 16, 2016, we recruited and enrolled 1050 individuals who received either vaccine or placebo. Of the 350, 348, and 352 individuals randomly assigned to three-dose, two-dose, and one-dose groups, respectively, 108, 115, and 115 from the Colombian cohort were dengue seropositive at baseline and received a booster; 55 and 53 in the three-dose group received a booster after 1 year and 2 years, respectively, as did 59 and 56 in the two-dose group, and 62 and 53 in the one-dose group. After the three-dose primary schedule, non-inferiority was shown for serotypes 2 (GMR 0·746; 95% CI 0·550-1·010) and 3 (1·040; 0·686-1·570) but not serotypes 1 (0·567; 0·399-0·805) and 4 (0·647; 0·434-0·963) for the 1-year booster, and again for serotypes 2 (0·871; 0·673-1·130) and 3 (1·150; 0·887-1·490) but not serotypes 1 (0·688; 0·479-0·989) and 4 (0·655; 0·471-0·911) for the 2-year booster. Similarly, after the two-dose primary schedule, non-inferiority was shown for serotypes 2 (0·809; 0·505-1·300) and 3 (1·19; 0·732-1·940) but not serotypes 1 (0·627; 0·342-1·150) and 4 (0·499; 0·331-0·754) for the 1-year booster, and for serotype 3 (0·911; 0·573-1·450) but not serotypes 1 (0·889; 0·462-1·710), 2 (0·677; 0·402-1·140), and 4 (0·702; 0·447-1·100) for the 2-year booster. Thus, non-inferiority of the 1-year or 2-year booster was not shown after the three-dose or two-dose primary vaccination regimen in dengue-seropositive participants. No safety concerns occurred with the 1-year or 2-year CYD-TDV booster.
CYD-TDV booster 1 year or 2 years after the two-dose or three-dose primary vaccination regimen does not elicit a consistent, meaningful booster effect against all dengue serotypes in participants who are seropositive for dengue at baseline.
Sanofi Pasteur.
For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
登革热在热带和亚热带的许多国家流行,该疾病在这些地区造成了大量发病率和医疗保健负担。我们之前比较了仅有的经批准的登革热疫苗 CYD-TDV(Dengvaxia;赛诺菲巴斯德,里昂,法国)在有既往登革热暴露史的 9 岁及以上人群中进行一剂、两剂或三剂初级方案后的抗体反应。在这项研究中,我们评估了在这些初级疫苗接种方案后是否需要进行 CYD-TDV 加强针。
在这项随机、对照、2 期非劣效性研究中,从哥伦比亚的三个地点和菲律宾的三个地点招募了 9-50 岁的健康个体(不包括通常的疫苗接种禁忌者),他们通过分层的区组随机化(按地点和年龄组),使用独立的语音应答系统,以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配,每 6 个月接受三剂 CYD-TDV(三剂组)、一剂安慰剂加两剂 CYD-TDV(两剂组)或两剂安慰剂加一剂 CYD-TDV(一剂组)。参与者还随机(1:1)接受 CYD-TDV 加强针,在最后一剂初级疫苗后 1 年或 2 年进行。每剂 CYD-TDV 剂量为 0.5 mL,在三角肌区域皮下给药。研究人员和主办方、与研究人员互动的研究人员、参与者及其父母或合法可接受的代表对分组分配保持盲态。通过 50%蚀斑减少中和试验测量中和抗体,计算几何平均滴度(GMT)。由于研究方案的改变,仅在哥伦比亚队列中基线时登革热血清阳性的参与者中进行了加强疫苗接种。主要结局是证明在两剂和三剂初级方案后 1 年或 2 年接种加强疫苗不劣于两剂和三剂初级方案;如果四价血清型之间的组间(三剂或两剂组加强疫苗接种后第 28 天 GMT 与三剂初级方案后第 28 天 GMT 的几何平均比[三剂组])的双侧调整 95%CI 下限高于 0.5,则证明两剂和三剂初级方案的两剂和三剂初级方案的非劣效性。如果所有四价血清型均达到非劣效性,则证明 1 年或 2 年的加强疫苗是有效的。在所有接受加强疫苗的参与者中评估安全性。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT02628444,现已关闭入组。
2016 年 5 月 2 日至 9 月 16 日,我们招募并纳入了 1050 名接受疫苗或安慰剂的参与者。在随机分配至三剂、两剂和一剂组的 350、348 和 352 名个体中,分别有 108、115 和 115 名来自哥伦比亚队列的个体在基线时登革热血清阳性并接受了加强疫苗接种;55 名和 53 名在三剂组中在 1 年后和 2 年后接受了加强疫苗接种,59 名和 56 名在两剂组中接受了加强疫苗接种,62 名和 53 名在一剂组中接受了加强疫苗接种。在三剂初级方案后,血清型 2(GMR 0.746;95%CI 0.550-1.010)和 3(1.040;0.686-1.570)显示非劣效性,但血清型 1(0.567;0.399-0.805)和 4(0.647;0.434-0.963)未显示非劣效性,1 年加强疫苗接种后也是如此;同样,在两剂初级方案后,血清型 2(0.871;0.673-1.130)和 3(1.150;0.887-1.490)显示非劣效性,但血清型 1(0.688;0.479-0.989)和 4(0.655;0.471-0.911)未显示非劣效性,2 年加强疫苗接种后也是如此。同样,在两剂初级方案后,血清型 2(0.809;0.505-1.300)和 3(1.19;0.732-1.940)显示非劣效性,但血清型 1(0.627;0.342-1.150)和 4(0.499;0.331-0.754)未显示非劣效性,1 年加强疫苗接种后也是如此;对于血清型 3(0.911;0.573-1.450),但不是血清型 1(0.889;0.462-1.710)、2(0.677;0.402-1.140)和 4(0.702;0.447-1.100),两剂加强疫苗接种后也是如此。因此,在登革热血清阳性的参与者中,三剂或两剂初级疫苗接种方案后 1 年或 2 年的加强疫苗接种并未显示出对所有四价血清型的一致、有意义的增强作用。在 1 年或 2 年的 CYD-TDV 加强疫苗接种中未出现安全性问题。
在登革热血清阳性的参与者中,两剂或三剂初级疫苗接种方案后 1 年或 2 年的 CYD-TDV 加强疫苗接种并未显示出对所有四价血清型的一致、有意义的增强作用。
赛诺菲巴斯德。