Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kidney360. 2020 Mar 6;1(4):306-313. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000052020. eCollection 2020 Apr 30.
The cannulation technique of a hemodialysis vascular access has remained controversial with differing viewpoints. The quality of dialysis, overall patient safety, and individual dialysis experience often dictate the type of cannulation technique used in clinical practice. The three commonly used techniques to access a hemodialysis vascular access are the rope ladder, area, and buttonhole. Although the buttonhole technique has been around since the mid-1970s, the dialysis community remains divided on its suitability for routine use to provide maintenance hemodialysis therapy. The proponents of this technique value the ease of cannulation with less pain and discomfort whereas the opponents highlight the increased risk of infection. The actual clinical evidence from the United States is limited and remains inconclusive. The current review provides an overview of the available experience from the United States, highlighting the correct technique of creating a buttonhole, summarizing the current evidence, and recommending a need for larger randomized controlled studies in both in-center and home hemodialysis populations.
血液透析血管通路的置管技术一直存在争议,不同观点各持己见。透析质量、整体患者安全性和个体透析体验通常决定了临床实践中使用的置管技术类型。三种常用于进入血液透析血管通路的技术是绳梯、区域和纽扣眼。尽管纽扣眼技术自 20 世纪 70 年代中期以来就已存在,但透析界对于其是否适合常规使用以提供维持性血液透析治疗仍存在分歧。该技术的支持者看重其易于置管且疼痛和不适程度较轻,而反对者则强调感染风险增加。来自美国的实际临床证据有限且尚无定论。本次综述提供了来自美国的现有经验概述,重点介绍了正确的纽扣眼制作技术,总结了当前的证据,并建议在中心和家庭血液透析人群中进行更大规模的随机对照研究。