Department of Infection and Immunology, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, 7-426 Morioka-cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8710, Japan.
Department of Child Health, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Obu, Japan.
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;41(8):2483-2489. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06138-7. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 (EULAR/ACR-2019) classification criteria with prior classification schemes for patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE). This single-center retrospective study examined 53 patients with cSLE and 53 patients having antinuclear antibody (ANA) titers ≥ 1:80 but not cSLE as controls. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, original criteria reported earlier in 2019, the ACR-1997 criteria, and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012 (SLICC-2012) criteria. The frequency of positivity in the cSLE group for each item of the EULAR/ACR-2019, ACR-1997, and SLICC-2012 criteria was determined. Characteristics of the misclassified patients were also investigated. All patients with cSLE had ANA titers ≥ 1:80. The non-SLE diagnoses included juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), and others. Sensitivities of the EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, the original criteria, the ACR-1997 criteria, and the SLICC-2012 criteria were 100%, 100%, 86.8%, and 100%, respectively; the specificities were 84.9%, 92.5%, 98.1%, and 88.7%, respectively. In the cSLE group, the items of the SLE-specific antibody (100%), complement (98.1%), hematological (94.3%), and renal (84.9%) domains were frequently observed in the EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria. The EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria misclassified patient controls more frequently, especially those with MCTD or pSS, as having SLE than the previous criteria. The EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria for cSLE had high sensitivity but low specificity; the weighted scoring of the original criteria reported earlier in 2019 may confer higher specificity and be more appropriate for the classification of SLE in a pediatric population. Key Points • The EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria for cSLE had high sensitivity but low specificity. • The EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria more frequently misclassified non-SLE patients who did not have SLE, especially those with MCTD or pSS, as having SLE than the previous criteria in patients with childhood onset. • The weighted scoring of the original criteria reported earlier in 2019 may confer higher specificity and be a more appropriate classification of SLE for a pediatric population.
这项研究旨在比较欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年(EULAR/ACR-2019)分类标准与既往儿童发病的系统性红斑狼疮(cSLE)分类方案的敏感性和特异性。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 53 例 cSLE 患者和 53 例抗核抗体(ANA)滴度≥1:80 但无 cSLE 的患者作为对照。计算了 EULAR/ACR-2019 标准、2019 年早些时候报告的原始标准、ACR-1997 标准和 2012 年系统性红斑狼疮国际合作临床(SLICC-2012)标准的敏感性和特异性。确定了 cSLE 组中 EULAR/ACR-2019、ACR-1997 和 SLICC-2012 标准中每项的阳性频率。还研究了分类错误患者的特征。所有 cSLE 患者的 ANA 滴度均≥1:80。非 SLE 诊断包括青少年特发性炎性肌病、原发性干燥综合征(pSS)、青少年特发性关节炎、系统性硬化症、混合性结缔组织病(MCTD)和其他疾病。EULAR/ACR-2019 标准、原始标准、ACR-1997 标准和 SLICC-2012 标准的敏感性分别为 100%、100%、86.8%和 100%,特异性分别为 84.9%、92.5%、98.1%和 88.7%。在 cSLE 组中,EULAR/ACR-2019 标准中 SLE 特异性抗体(100%)、补体(98.1%)、血液学(94.3%)和肾脏(84.9%)域的项目经常出现。EULAR/ACR-2019 标准比既往标准更频繁地将 MCTD 或 pSS 等非 SLE 患者误诊为 SLE。EULAR/ACR-2019 标准对 cSLE 的敏感性高,但特异性低;2019 年早些时候报告的原始标准的加权评分可能具有更高的特异性,更适合儿科人群的 SLE 分类。
EULAR/ACR-2019 标准对 cSLE 的敏感性高,但特异性低。
EULAR/ACR-2019 标准比既往标准更频繁地将 MCTD 或 pSS 等非 SLE 患者误诊为 SLE。
2019 年早些时候报告的原始标准的加权评分可能具有更高的特异性,更适合儿科人群的 SLE 分类。