First Department of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Interbalkan European Medical Center, Asklipiou 10, Pylaia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 May-Jun;65:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Education level has been long considered a life-quality modifier, but little is known about its relation to life expectancy in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study aims to assess possible correlations between education level and survival in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
This retrospective cohort study used data from a randomised trial of 1082 hospitalised patients with AF (mean age of 75 ± 11 years) who were followed up after discharge. Patients were divided into three groups based on their education level: i) none or primary (NPEL), ii) secondary (SEL), and iii) tertiary education level (TEL). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were used to compare survival rates between groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The composite secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality or any hospitalisation.
After a median 31-month follow-up period, 289 (41.9%) patients died in the NPEL group, 75 (31.1%) in the SEL group, and 29 (19.1%) in the TEL group. The aHRs for all-cause mortality were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66; p < 0.001) for the TEL group compared with the NPEL group, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.93; p = 0.02) for the TEL group compared with the SEL group, and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93; p = 0.01) for the SEL group compared with the NPEL group. The corresponding aHRs for the composite secondary outcome were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.52; p < 0.001), 0.49 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.80; p < 0.001), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50 to 9.91; p = 0.01).
Higher education levels were independently associated with fewer fatal and non-fatal outcomes in recently hospitalised patients with AF.
教育水平一直被认为是生活质量的调节剂,但人们对其与心血管疾病患者预期寿命的关系知之甚少。本研究旨在评估房颤(AF)患者的教育水平与生存之间可能存在的相关性。
本回顾性队列研究使用了一项随机临床试验中 1082 名住院 AF 患者(平均年龄 75±11 岁)的数据,这些患者在出院后进行了随访。根据教育水平,患者分为三组:i)无或小学(NPEL),ii)中学(SEL)和 iii)高等教育水平(TEL)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和多变量调整后的危险比(aHR)比较组间生存率。主要结局是全因死亡率。复合次要结局是心血管死亡率或任何住院治疗。
中位随访 31 个月后,NPEL 组 289 名(41.9%)患者死亡,SEL 组 75 名(31.1%)患者死亡,TEL 组 29 名(19.1%)患者死亡。与 NPEL 组相比,TEL 组的全因死亡率的 aHR 为 0.42(95%CI,0.27 至 0.66;p<0.001),与 SEL 组相比,TEL 组的 aHR 为 0.55(95%CI,0.33 至 0.93;p=0.02),与 NPEL 组相比,SEL 组的 aHR 为 0.68(95%CI,0.50 至 0.93;p=0.01)。复合次要结局的相应 aHR 为 0.36(95%CI,0.23 至 0.52;p<0.001),0.49(95%CI,0.29 至 0.80;p<0.001)和 0.67(95%CI,0.50 至 9.91;p=0.01)。
在最近住院的 AF 患者中,较高的教育水平与致命和非致命结局的减少独立相关。