School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:30-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
The relationship between visual attention and visual awareness has long been hotly debated. There has been limited evidence on whether the neural marker of spatial attention precedes or succeeds that of visual awareness in the processing of emotional faces. The current study aims to investigate the temporal sequence between the electrophysiological signatures of visual awareness (the visual awareness negativity - VAN) and spatial attention (the N2pc), in contexts where emotional faces are task-relevant (Experiment 1) or task-irrelevant (Experiment 2). Fifty-six healthy participants were presented with fearful and neutral faces under different levels of visibility using backward masking. They either performed a face detection task (Experiment 1) or a contrast detection task while ignoring the faces (Experiment 2). Compared to subliminal stimuli, supraliminal stimuli produced more negative ERPs at 170-270 msec and 210-310 msec in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively, identified as the VAN. The P3, a component also frequently considered to reflect awareness, produced a similar effect with larger amplitudes for supraliminal than subliminal stimuli in both experiments. With respect to spatial attention, a significant N2pc was observed in response to fearful faces but only in the supraliminal viewing condition of Experiment 1, in which faces were task-relevant. Crucially, the VAN was found to precede the N2pc in this case. Our results suggest that spatial attention as indexed by the N2pc, is oriented towards fearful faces when they are relevant to participants' task and are consciously processed. Moreover, an early phenomenal stage of awareness, reflected by the VAN, precedes spatial attention shifting to fearful faces.
视觉注意与视觉意识之间的关系一直是热门话题。对于情绪面孔加工过程中,空间注意的神经标记是否先于或后于视觉意识,目前还没有太多的证据。本研究旨在探讨视觉意识的电生理特征(视觉意识负波-VAN)和空间注意(N2pc)之间的时间顺序,在情绪面孔与任务相关(实验 1)或与任务无关(实验 2)的情况下。56 名健康参与者在不同可见度下使用后向掩蔽呈现恐惧和中性面孔。他们要么执行面孔检测任务(实验 1),要么在忽略面孔的情况下执行对比检测任务(实验 2)。与阈下刺激相比,在实验 1 和实验 2 中,分别在 170-270ms 和 210-310ms 时,超阈刺激产生了更负的 ERP,被识别为 VAN。P3,一个也常被认为反映意识的成分,在两个实验中,超阈刺激比阈下刺激产生了更大的振幅。关于空间注意,在实验 1 中,当面孔与参与者的任务相关且被有意识地处理时,对恐惧面孔产生了显著的 N2pc。至关重要的是,在这种情况下,发现 VAN 先于 N2pc。我们的研究结果表明,当恐惧面孔与参与者的任务相关且被有意识地处理时,空间注意会被 N2pc 索引到恐惧面孔上。此外,反映 VAN 的意识早期现象学阶段先于空间注意转移到恐惧面孔。